Today was the usual influx of cash from the reinvestment of dividends, contributions from company 401k accounts, company bonuses, and pensions which are often automatically allocated to the market-place without much human intervention on the first trading day of the new month. As the result, the wave which I showed yesterday as the invalidation point was hit today at the end of the day. This is shown in the chart below.
As a result, I demoted the waves in the count to minute waves, and we now have a Minor wave 1, at the low. I did stick to my word about the invalidation point, and the count below does meet degree labeling requirements.
ES Futures - Hourly - Minor 1 |
I told blog reader and contributor BBRider I would consider the downward diagonal, which he must be given credit for proposing, if an when there was upward overlap. There was, today, at the very end of the session. There wasn't much point to looking for a better count until there was that overlap.
One problem is that the count from the bottom is a complete mess, and therefore may still be an incomplete structure - and it 'may' be the start of an expanding diagonal.
However, given the rise in the EWO to the level it has risen to (beyond -40% of the trough low), it appears that a second wave is in progress. By comparison, wave 2 will have a lot of hours to burn yet - many of which will occur in the overnight.
This is all I can add at this time. It was a funky wave down - not withstanding the 77 point drop in the futures last night - but there is alternation as shown and minute ((v)) on a 5-minute chart is an expanding ending diagonal that counts very well.
Have a good start to the evening.
TraderJoe
So the weekend count was wrong then.
ReplyDeleteOnward.
It happens to the best of us..
DeleteI have deleted the remainder of your posts. You can clearly see from this post on February 10th..way before the top, that I was looking for the best way to call "a top".
Deletehttp://studyofcycles.blogspot.com/2020/02/ugly-but-still-legal.html
I told you to either cite 'all' of my work, or to cite 'none' of it. You refuse to follow these rules.
Further, you or anyone else on the blog is not allowed to use this blog to criticize any other market analyst, technician, or blog contributor.
This site is about wave counting 'only'. And since you offer no counts, do no work, and show no charts, I have made the decision - after warning you numerous times that your posts are not wanted here, and from here forward are banned.
But that should not be a problem for you because you have demonstrated you are in no way interested in Elliott wave. You are just interested in criticizing others.
Sorry, it is your behavior and not mine that has gotten you banned.
TJ
I'm looking at this correction on spx. Overlap and degree prevents impuls I believe.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/p-uej
X2 overlaps the "a" wave of Y but not the W...
Deletewhat if your (X) is just "b" ?
Deleteit would cause degree violations btw A & C I believe, and the last shot up prevents c to form as a diagonal, and the triangle I have shown is more likely than not a "b" wave triangle not a 2?
DeleteMy apologies if I was unclear. The second (X) is shorter in price and time than the first (X). What if the second (X) is b?
DeleteMSFT looking very readable. 5 down off the top, now 5 up off lows.
ReplyDeleteTend to disagree on the five up in MSFT .. you can count them how you like, but for me, I want to see a 1.618 wave.
Deletehttps://invst.ly/p-umf
Not there yet.
TJ
Yes, just posted after doing a quick glance.
DeleteGap fill potential seems strong. Might take a week or so to complete this correction.
I am leaning towards the price action after the diagonal as a flat with a deep b at the low.
ReplyDeleteConcerns me that the 4 in the above does not so up on the EWO.
Flat as the A wave?
DeleteCould be all of the correction or part of a combo like Flat X Zig Zag to take up more time.
DeleteIf the dive to 2854 was an irregular B of 2, then we ought to know tomorrow, as C of 2 completed with the kissback at 3090 of the topline of the giant megaphone from January, 2018. This may be all the "retrace" we get.
ReplyDeleteAll readers, please see my post in response to d-w above at 5:10 am. This is a reminder to you all to follow the rules of this blog. Comments to 'flame' other sites, technicians, blog readers and/or contributors are not welcome here. This site is about 'Wave counting only' - pure and simple. This site is not for your political views, your views on central banks, or any other opinion-related material. You may post a link to a very important recent news article if you think others may have not seen it, but only if it relates directly to wave counting. You may not post a link to EW work which is not your own, or to paid sites.
ReplyDeleteThis site is 'not' about your trading or investing recommendations or mine. It is not about your track record as a trader, or any specific trades you have called in the past. Posts that include phrases like "go long/short" any instrument or "hedge here" are directly in contrast with the purpose of this site. If that is what you are looking for, go elsewhere.
Further, if your counts show symbols such as "Intermediate Degree" i.e. (2), when working with hourly charts, where the minute symbol, ((ii)) or circle-ii is most appropriate, then I know you do not understand 'degree labeling' at all, or are too lazy to bother with the basics, and your work and your ideas are subject to deletion.
Once again, this site is about 1) counting, and 2) measuring the Elliott Wave at hand. It is about nothing else. Don't push me, or your posts will be banned too. Have I made myself clear?
TJ
Monitoring Smaller CD
ReplyDeletehttps://imgur.com/s3OXGyB
we had a slightly higher high in overnight - couldn't that be the final 5 of a minor abc from 2856? Also it's a long term resistance area as christiangustafson pointed out, so the quasi "double top" and failure there seems appropriate. Well, I guess I'll know soon if I'm wrong. Good luck and thank you for your charts
DeleteTaking to long, may also be in e wave of triangle.
DeleteTriangle was getting to flat on the bottom, bull flag?
Deletethanks, wow caught the spike right before it happened because I saw your triangle E - thank you
DeleteA slightly larger CD is hanging on by .75 but has lost its wedge shape.
ReplyDeleteBollinger bands very narrow on 1 hour S&P 500 futures: https://invst.ly/q03kx
ReplyDeleteES 15-min 'Possible' running triangle since 20:00 - subject to all the usual invalidation criteria. Next best option a flat.
ReplyDeleteThere is the thrust from the triangle, and the new high. Triangle did not invalidate, but it may have been a flat, too.
Delete..closer look .. triangle 'did' invalidate by a couple tics; likely the 'flat'. With that the case there is no 'ending wave', such as a triangle or diagonal, that I see yet.
Deletemy best
ReplyDeletehttps://imgur.com/tGtjVph
On this above idea of a wxyxz the two x waves were the same length in time and the w and y are close to the same. This puts the end of z, which could easily have a truncated c in it, at around tomorrows close.
Deleteand in the w and y both have fairly decent c = a properties.
Delete(CNBC) Fed cuts rates by half a percentage point to combat coronavirus slowdown
ReplyDeleteS&P500 cash gap at 3,117 closed.
ReplyDeleteThis is the count I see, and it aligns with the daily bars. Needs to trade below 3,046 to start anything to the down side. Not there yet.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/q04hv
TJ
Here is a little more meat on the bones.
Deletehttps://invst.ly/q04ov
TJ
Both blue a and c of iii is bigger than i
DeleteI'm looking at this, I wonder, why did iv of (c) never overlap i and why is v still shorter than iii? Did it finish an impuls?
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/q04xg
Here is the (a) wave
Deletehttps://invst.ly/q04y6
..also viable .. just that within your (a), the fourth wave has fewer "trading hours" than the second wave did. But, it might have more "clock hours" because the gap occurred over a non-trading weekend. I 'do not know' if that is valid or not. The Expanding Diagonal is the pattern that Elliott analysts have the least experience with because they are so rare. So I 'must' keep an open mind as to how they operate because there are so few instances to study - both the smaller one and the larger one.
DeleteI have one more option that I think puts iii at today's high. But you have to go back on a five-minute chart - all they way back to the beginning of the retrace wave. If there is a smaller diagonal i, then there can be a "running" second wave, then iii, up, to today's high.
DeleteHere is that option ...
Deletehttps://invst.ly/q05fz
TJ
..here is more on that option, and it may fit degree labeling better.
Deletehttps://invst.ly/q05k0
It puts iii of ((3)) on the maximum of the MACD to help be a bit more objective.
TJ
.. no overlap would be allowed on wave ((1)).
Delete..the retrace was 38.2%
DeleteIn 'cash' ..sideways triangle option off the top .. or we are getting an expanding diagonal downward. The three-wave patterns are tough to deal with.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/q05xf
TJ
still on the table as well I believe.
ReplyDeletehttps://imgur.com/hJCwrt2
An item to be aware of ...the RUT (futures) have critical overlap already.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/q06go
TJ
Hung on the wall at the Fed Trading Desk. "Cut by 3 if not green by 3"
DeleteRUT futures have a new lower low, and need 1481.50 to create a downward diagonal (or triple zz), but the former seems more likely.
ReplyDeleteThe lower degree b of 2 is bigger than 1 with inpulse count from bottom
ReplyDeletesorry, cash or futures ?
DeleteThe futures count you showed as an alternate possibility
DeleteRight.. that is now 'water under the bridge' with downward overlap on ((1)), as well.
DeleteTJ
There is is 1481 in the RUT futures, and the expanding diagonal possibility is validated. It 'looks' like a 5-3-5-3-5, too. But, it could go lower if it wants.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/q076w
TJ
ES would have an expanding diagonal at 2,994 or lower.
ReplyDeleteThere is 2,993 in the ES, as well, and the ES can also qualify for an expanding diagonal lower.
DeleteTJ
THX ET, my zzz is out.
ReplyDeletewelcome BBR..
DeleteIn ES, upwards over 3030 would be a degree change.
ReplyDelete..better measurement shows 3028
DeleteET, can this exp diagonal be considered an X wave of a double zz? If it would want to?
ReplyDeleteI was thinking since it’s possible to count a finished tripple zz on cash, it’s more likely an expanded diagonal is leading
DeleteES ..now up over 5-min declining diagonal trend line from the high
ReplyDeleteJoe, could you explain the degree change comment, or point to a link? Thanks
ReplyDelete..see comment below.
DeleteES .. now up over 3030, and the degree has changed to upward (largest upward wave since the downward diagonal began).
ReplyDeleteThank you
DeleteJoe, 0_2 trendline -are all your counts going to comply? and Are you going to comply with 2nd wave taking more time than first wave? i'm still stuck on what's going into your thinking. thanks marc
ReplyDeleteDo you realize there is a 12 word phrase you can tell your partner... that will induce deep emotions of love and impulsive appeal to you buried inside his chest?
ReplyDeleteBecause hidden in these 12 words is a "secret signal" that triggers a man's instinct to love, treasure and care for you with all his heart...
12 Words That Trigger A Man's Desire Instinct
This instinct is so hardwired into a man's genetics that it will drive him to work better than ever before to love and admire you.
Matter of fact, fueling this influential instinct is so binding to achieving the best possible relationship with your man that once you send your man one of these "Secret Signals"...
...You will soon find him open his soul and mind for you in such a way he never expressed before and he'll perceive you as the only woman in the world who has ever truly fascinated him.