Every Tom, Dick & Harry internet analyst will tell you about how they recognized a possible top today. They used their cycle work. Or they reviewed their "volume profile" and saw how rarified things were getting up here. Or they used their AVWAP (Anchored Volume-Weighted Average Price) and the five-day moving average and saw the breech of them. Or they used their support and resistance lines to tell you, "Once this level was gone, the next level was so & so". Or they will tell you how their upper Bollinger Bands "acted as a brick wall yesterday to stop the price advance". They will typically do this to try to sell you some subscription or some market service, or to get more clicks for their YouTube videos (and, hence, ad revenue).
I will not do that today. I will instead plead with you not to assume anything. I will offer you one chart, with more discussion below the chart. The chart is of the S&P500 daily in September & October 1987.
I beg of you to look at this chart and learn its lesson. The decline started modestly enough with about ten down days in late August & early September. Then there was almost a month of dickin' around in a flat wave back to about the 50% level before the October decline started. Some people probably felt pretty good about the rebound. But here is the lesson. When the decline got started, did it stop at equality (100%)? It did not. Did it stop at 1.618 level for wave three? It did not. Did it stop at the 2.618 level for wave three? It did not. It kept going until the Fibonacci 4.414 extension level was reached, wiping out all those might have assumed at the 1.618 level there would be a turn for a fourth wave. And it took only two days from 1.618 to 4.414!
So, then what? Is that the end of the assumptions? Heck no. One would then have to think (sic) with a down wave being so large in price, there simply must be a fourth and a fifth wave to make another lower wave after that to finish the impulse. Right? Well, as the chart shows - while there was a new 'closing' low, price did not ever make a new intraday low. The bottom in December was what we call a truncation - and a fair sized one - and the rest is upward history.
So, on to today. Yes, today was impulsive well enough. But there are only three-waves-down from the recent all-time high. So, what are we to think? Well, not too much. There must be a fourth wave the adheres to the 'rules' and then a fifth wave lower than it and at least roughly equal to wave one to claim an impulse. Is it likely it will happen? It has odds. The odds are better than 50%, but not by much. Why not? Because with only three-waves down, the market could 'by the rules' form a diagonal structure to move lower. So based on the state of knowledge right now, the odds might be 55-45. Then, depending on the overnight and the open on Monday, the odds can be updated. In other words, look to see if it happens, but don't assume it will.
Let's extend the lesson to today's wave.
Here we see the three waves. Did today's wave stop at equality? It did not. Did it stop at 1.618? It did not. Did it stop at 2.000? It did not. Did it stop at 2.618? Well, we simply do not know yet. There is no proportional turn to the second wave in the series. The Elliott Wave Oscillator (EWO or AO) is still bright red and pointing down on this hourly timescale.
Does that mean we should expect a fourth wave overnight on Sunday into Monday morning. No! We should not expect it. It has odds! Maybe you and I rate the odds as pretty good. Maybe someone over in Japan or England - that couldn't sell when they wanted to today - has other ideas and wants to unload at their earliest opportunity and not wait for more pain to set in. Maybe it's a true crash wave and hits one of those larger Fibonacci numbers hardly giving anyone time to react (like the two days in 1987). Those scenarios can change the odds.
Or maybe there's news announcements during the weekend or on Monday that overrule the urge to sell, and it all stops here or only slightly lower for the time being.
The point here is not that Elliott Wave is useless. It has some benefits in the market. But, rather, the point is that the market is a wild non-linear and chaotic system. And it's going to give profit to some and knock others out as it sees fit to accommodate the buy & sell orders it receives or does not receive.
So, if you can't necessarily count on Elliott Wave, what can you count on? Well, I'm here to tell you to be careful. You might wake up one morning to find the internet out, and so orders become difficult to place. Or you might wake up to find a limit move in your favorite stock or commodity and you become trapped in your position. Stock & index futures trading have limits and halts, too. I truly hope these things do not become bothers for either you or I. But market history has a way of saying different at the worst possible times.
So, please do not assume anything, particularly as regards Elliott Wave. How you trade is strictly your own business. I am here to show you - among other things - it's not always what it might seem. And especially to remind you that people with much, much more money than you or I have can make a rational or an irrational decision at any moment and it can affect the retail trader greatly. Further, the government can affect markets with announcements good or bad at any time - and I can assure you they won't consult me first.
So, be patient, be calm, be flexible and realize to most market opinions there are associated odds which may or not be in your favor. You might assess something as 70-30, but it's the 30% that comes through for some reason you might not be able to see. You might not be considering the truly big money and what they have to gain or lose. Or you might not be able to assess it accurately because they can act irrationally, too. Or, they think they are acting rationally, but all they do is scare people. Like the story that comes out today with the headline,
Social Security recipients may lose $500 monthly in 2032, report says
Great. Good job people. Thanks for getting everyone all riled up and thinking they might have to sell some investments earlier because they will lose some Social Security. This kind of stuff is what helps make the market so chaotic. Even if no one acted on the specific story, you have salted the very idea of it in the back of someone's mind.
So, try to remember that IFF we enter a bear market, everything will be backwards from a bull market. All of the assumptions that went into financial planning (you know the 60-40 balanced stock-bond allocation kind of stuff), interest rate assumptions, home value assumptions, etc. all get turned on their head. For example, right now there are people on the internet telling others what specific combination of new ETF's can guarantee them X% return per month. And a lot of these people assume linear growth in the A-I stocks. It's a warning flag. And they assume these products will trade in all bear market conditions. Another flag. Some of these things are untested.
Be careful out there. Some cities just fixed the potholes from two winters ago - if you get my drift.
Have an excellent start to the evening,
TraderJoe










.png)