The U.S. Federal Reserve cut their interest rate by 0.5% today, the equivalent of two cuts all at once, are now back down to a target range between
1%-1.25%, and made the first inter-meeting action since December 2008 - during the financial crisis. The market initially popped on the news, yippee, and then it sold off quite a bit. But, wait a minute. The rate cuts are supposed to boost the market, right? (Eventually it might for a while). Oh, you say, but traders sold because the move was widely expected? Buy on the rumor, sell the fact? Hmm.
According to Steve Leisman of CNBC, the move was intended to 'shock' markets. Is that why they ended lower?
So, nothing has changed with the chart of the ES futures, other than to change the time scale, below, which we are changing to the 4-hr chart.
ES Futures - 4 Hr - Some or All of 2 |
As you can see from the Fibonacci ruler shown, the up move reached the 50% retrace level. This means it has, already, qualified as a retrace that can have a 1.618 wave to the down-side following it.
The up move looks shorter time-wise than the down wave, but the EWO has come back to the zero line - which is all it needed to do. Accordingly, we are saying this wave could be "some or all of 2". Given the number of styles of corrections, we must watch for further development. While we are, we will remind you of some of the most common kinds of corrections for second wave: zigzag, or multiple zigzag, flat, expanded flat, flat-x-zigzag, or flat-x-triangle.
We will remind you that wave 2 can never be a triangle in it's entirety.
So far, the up move has been orderly. It 'can' be counted as the expanding diagonal a wave we cited yesterday, but we also have a sneaking suspicion it can be counted as a three-wave sequence. Accordingly, the wave label at this stage can be a, a-3 or 2.
Remember, if this up wave is an a-3 wave move, then for an Flat, the b-3 wave down must reach the 90% level of the wave 1 bottom by Elliott wave 'rule'.
We will better label this wave as more information about its nature comes in. We have a sneaking suspicion that in addition to the 'grinding up wave' that you see above, there might at some point come a "see your creator wave" near the end of the move - one that will convince you that we are going over the top again.
Until then, we did a decent job today counting some intraday waves. We had fun and hope you enjoyed it.
Have a good start to your evening.
TraderJoe
Corrective ZZ up. Target 3180 or thereabouts.
ReplyDeleteThe up move to the ED 53535 has excited the time of the decline. Should be interesting.
ReplyDelete.618 high so far
Deletecertainly seems like corrective waves overnight.
Deletegot some overlap
DeleteThis is all I have so far from the overnight.
ReplyDelete1. There were five-waves up in wedge (extended first wave), with alternation.
2. Then there were three-waves down.
3. Then, there was a 90% up wave, which 'could' be the b wave of a FLAT, or just the 'start' of a b wave of a Flat. Possible to go 'over the high again' to make a larger more complicated flat wave.
4. The down wave has 'not' taken as much time as the up wave, yet.
https://invst.ly/q0kjf
TJ
p.s. the overnight low may have been a slightly truncated 'c' wave of a larger downward (b) wave.
DeleteJoe, is the "time" taken by the wave anytime in any count a rule in your counting or you just consider it? if its not a rule do you know what percent of the time the guideline is met? thanks
Delete@marc ..wave 'shapes' are as dependent on time, as they are on 'price'. A triangle is different from a flat in 'time' as well as in price.
Deletein an impulse, then,
Deletesecond wave time versus first - does it have a rule? fourth wave time versus third - does it have a rule - or you always referring to guidelines? if extended wave is the third can the second take less time than the first?
@marc .. what did I show you in the impulse wave count, above?
Deletei cant tell if thats a hard rule or a guideline.
Deleteits a guideline if 2 can be complete. correct?
Deletecan you please be less cryptic and explain ? i am not the only one interested i can assure you. thanks
DeleteET...so how is your book coming?!
ReplyDeletehow about 1 ended at 3028, 3 from 3013 to 30375, triangle for 4 and now 5th to 3090 plus
ReplyDelete3rd to 3075
ReplyDeleteNope .. because a line from zero to your "2", cuts off a part of your wave "3". And those are the wrong wave degrees, too.
Deleteok i can see the triangle around 3075
DeleteET, can you comment on a wave form - a good example is MSFT from Friday low to Tuesday high. Is that 5 waves that are unclear because they are an impulse within a correction, or 3 waves? How did you distinguish? Thank you
ReplyDeletehow about this double ZZ?
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/q0m-h
That is definitely one solution to the puzzle Erik. Here is another.
Deletehttps://invst.ly/q0n12
They both point the same way right now.
TJ
Double zz have (a) and (c) of W are both bigger than Y..is this a degree violation?
Delete..probably.
DeleteOk, then your proposed count is more likely!
DeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteEasy "water hack" burns 2 lbs OVERNIGHT
ReplyDeleteMore than 160 000 men and women are using a simple and SECRET "liquid hack" to drop 1-2 lbs each night as they sleep.
It's easy and works on everybody.
This is how you can do it yourself:
1) Go get a drinking glass and fill it with water half the way
2) And then learn this awesome hack
so you'll become 1-2 lbs skinnier the next day!