Yesterday we noted the outside reversal day. We also noted it was a day when a possible truncation occurred. Today was follow-through upward on the FED meeting results. That makes this picture of the S&P500 cash index possible. And it makes going over the highs again possible.
S&P500 Cash Index - Truncated Diagonal (Bullish Falling Wedge) |
I suspect things might have turned out differently if Russia had not invaded a foreign country and had the PPT (PWG) not gotten involved to prop up the market during times of uncertainty. You and I will note the market never got to over-sold technical extremes: there was only a bounce off the lower daily Bollinger Band. So, how else did this happen if it was not over-sold? Anyway, it is no concern of mine. My role is to try to count waves properly given the odds. For now, ES 4,100 is a price barrier to have to defeat lower.
It is likely cash closes should try to hold above the declining upper diagonal trend line if this count is correct. Price closed over the 18-day SMA (or the 'line in the sand'), greatly reducing the odds of a near term decline, but not the certainty. For that reason, I will be monitoring the expanding diagonal possibility, and will update that as something becomes more certain.
I will note that the Dow did make a completely acceptable expanding diagonal downward. I commented on that when it occurred. The S&P500 did not, however.
Have an excellent start to the evening.
TraderJoe
WTI - no rally here (as of yet) -
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/xoian
2yr vs FedFunds -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/qmeruxa19lupyfb/Rates.PNG/file
Really interesting. Thank you!
DeleteIndeed, the typical chart that ewi has been showing for many years. It would seem that not so many officials and so much protocol are needed in the central banks to finally follow the bond market.
DeleteIf the market lets go of the printer, were are 2yr treasuries going?
Delete👍 the fed funds follows the 2y with a lag
DeleteThe historical Volatility Spread of Delta Put minus Delta Call still in bearish to neutral zone. This correction has been long awaited and the put coverage levels were very high. It may be one of the reasons the movement has been slow and low in panic. Besides, I agree that there are waves of "makeup" by "ppt" or whoever. It will be interesting to see what prices reach this expiration.
ReplyDeleteVolatility Spread of Delta Put minus Delta Call in bullish zone at the close. Goal accomplished, leave out of the money a lot of put.
DeleteGLD - short term, DTBO triggered, leaving bear trap btm (of some degree).
ReplyDeleteSPY - short term -
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/xos7f
SPXcfd - which one?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/b9aitzrz35fbfah/Whichone.PNG/file
After looking at your count heres what I came up with. I think it's the last stand for the bears. The B wave triangle is a little iffy.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/i/ypuUjfnO/
Sorry I was in too big of a hurry and realized that my count won't work for a Contracting Diagonal only an Expanding Diagonal.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/i/qPDb75nC/
nupe .. the fourth wave in an expanding diagonal, must, 'by rule' be a zigzag, and not a flat or something else with a lower B wave.
DeleteTJ
Looks to me like a "B" wave would be a last chance for the exp. diag. It did occur above the prior low.
DeleteSPX - short term, current
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/xou7x
Have now reached our reversal btm horiz count target of 440.
DeleteES 12-hour: this is about the only clear way I see an Expanding Diagonal playing out in terms of zigzags subwaves.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/2I35tjmZ/
There have been so few examples of expanding diagonals, that perhaps the internal degree rules might not be as expected.
TJ
That is exactly what I have.
Delete👍interesting, thanks. It sure don’t look impulsive from the bottom
DeleteApplying the "Eight-Fold Path Method", it seems to me that the last wave you have as (c) of ((b)) in your chart counts better as a zigzag than as an impulse. Could it be this (a)(b)(c) a (w)(x)(y) ?
DeleteThat's the ((a))((b))((c)) I was thinking of. The hidden div. is the smaller (b). That's why I had the channel drawn. 👍🏻
DeleteThe smaller degree (a)-(c) perhaps could be a (w)-(y) for the larger ((b))?
Deleteminute b could be w-x-y; no issue.
DeleteTJ
WTI & GLD - update
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/ux8y9wlxm70u2fb/WTIGLD.PNG/file
The VIX is at lower BB and a close below 24 could be telling.
ReplyDeleteSPXcfd- early sign of possible downturn here (hrly).
ReplyDeleteWe have 3 down from the top ATH. most likely. So now whats the proper degree length for the next leg up if we want to entertain a bigger diagonal. does the (2) if we are in it now, have to be bigger than b of (1) ? if so we need another 1.50%...already longer in time. We could also do a wxy from ATH? so it doesnt seem that we are completely out of the woods.
ReplyDeleteDAX - (dly) Possible "a" wave?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/st4n8wcffjf1uu8/wave_A.PNG/file
ET
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/1m8o2j2wxjwr50b/SPY_US_Equity_%2528SPDR_S%2526P_500_ETF__2022-03-17_16-30-52.jpg/file
Where is the degree violation? the 0-2TL is not perfect - curious what you think
1 -3 trend line is no good either.
DeleteTJ