In light of the long weekend, this weekend video is a bit longer (about ~20 minutes) and goes into a little more rationale than some others. I hope you enjoy it.
This is the second posting for the weekend, so if you did not see the first post, you may wish to review it, too.
Have an excellent rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe
👍good work
ReplyDeleteThanks much.
DeleteThx
ReplyDeleteyw.
DeleteExcellent analysis, I have shared the link on my Twitter feed. Enjoy the short break.
ReplyDelete..thx
DeleteThanks so much for taking the time to make that excellent video! Enjoy the rest of your weekend!
DeleteThanks TJ. Sound reasoning for the 75:25
ReplyDeleteFantastic video!!! Thanks TJ as always...
ReplyDeleteThanks ET!
ReplyDeleteHere's a shot at another triangle which puts the steep and fast decline as the A wave of triangle instead of C. Only problem I see is A is bigger than all of (W), but in a triangle we measure net distance from start to E anyways?
https://invst.ly/bz4en
Easily your best work so far. Thank you Trader Joe!
ReplyDeleteThx scout.
DeleteThanks TJ. I've been downsizing and moving for the last few months and have lost track of what's going on with your blog. This video got me caught up and I appreciate it very much. I can actually follow your analysis as you point out the wave counts (as my elliot wave prowess isn't too good) and at least I can get a general idea of what's going on. I appreciate all your work and your willingness to share with us gratis. I wish more people who comment would be aware of this fact--that everything you share is without cost and freely given and it's very well thought out and detailed-- giving the best possibilities for future outcomes for whatever count you're working on. What more can anyone ask for? And, just an aside--I really like listening to your real voice on these videos. It's easier to listen to than the digital one. Thanks again!
ReplyDeleteThanks
Always welcome Rose. Thanks for saying & hope the move is going well!
DeleteJust wanted to say thanks as well.
ReplyDeleteWelcome BBR..
DeleteThanks as well! I find the COT info to be the most prescient.
ReplyDeleteWhen time permits, would it be possible to update the count on the futures 4hr chart?
Thanks again!
Still looking for resolution of the 4-hr charts. At this time can be w-x-y, up.
DeleteThanks TJ. Very informative video. Appreciate all your hard work.
ReplyDeleteWelcome Bob.
DeleteExcellent analysis. Great example of how appliction of other technical indicators- trend-lines, momentum indicators, COT data etc., can inform the likely E.W. count. Very few Ellioticians do it consistently. Thanks Joe...
ReplyDeleteThx & welcome Tach..
DeleteLooks like a diagonal in the works on ES.
ReplyDeleteWaiting for waves at this time on ES. Either diagonal that needs a new low or ZZZ getting weak in the channel.
DeleteSo good to hear your voice again Joe. Thanks for the superb analysis.
ReplyDeleteWelcome Roy.
DeleteOther than the gap, nothing too much to write home about, yet. Economic News reports at the top of the hour.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/bzti3
TJ
Interesting, an 'intra-day' gap lower on the econ reports.
Deletehttps://invst.ly/bztlh
TJ
Delete10:00a
Breaking ISM manufacturing falls to 49.1% in August from 51.2% in July
Yes indeed!
DeleteThey are spending literally hundreds of millions in a desperate attempt to maintain price above that 2900 S/R level. It is not immediately obvious to me why the consider that round number so critical, but there you have it. It seems to me the top of the gap just below, around 2890, would be where they would expend more ammunition.
18-day SMA.
Delete