Sunday, July 18, 2021

Avoiding Confirmation Bias

The dictionary defines confirmation bias as, "the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.". So, in other words, one uses new evidence (...prices going lower Friday...) to confirm that belief or theory, "that the market has topped". I said on Friday's post that with the minute ((v)) = ((i)), for the time being, the discussion of alternates needed to be put on hold. That is still the case. Yet, in an effort to show readers a more unbiased or neutral approach, below is the ES 8-Hr chart with just some chart notes on it.

ES Futures - 8 Hr - Chart Notes

The first note, in blue, shows the new trend line of interest with currently five touches on it, and a recent break on Friday, counted as an expanding diagonal. If the expanding diagonal retrace holds the top, it could be (i) or (a), down.

The second note is in red in the volume panel. The down (red) volume is increasing, and that is to be respected for the time being. 

The third chart note is down in the MACD indicator panel. The MACD has diverged with the local top, is declining, and the histogram bars are currently lower. This, too, is to be respected. Still the MACD has not gone below the zero line, yet, as a contrary indication. 

The fourth chart note is in brown below the 0% level of the Fibonacci ruler. In order to start a move much lower, or a diagonal wave of reasonable proportions, this level of 4,279 must be exceeded lower. (With regard to an upward diagonal, that is because a larger diagonal on this scale should typically have retrace waves that are 66 - 81%. We are nowhere near that level now.)

The fifth chart note is actually the Fibonacci ruler itself. It shows that the most recent up movement was only about 40% of the up move prior to that. That is a very odd proportion for the waves, as simply another contrary indication.  While it remains possible to count a top, even as an upward diagonal fifth wave, one could surmise that the two up waves are only a & c of an overall a,b,c of wave (i) of a contracting ending diagonal. Still, if this is only a wave (i), then the whole discussion of a diagonal is premature until or unless there is a new all-time-high for a wave (iii).

The sixth chart note is in black near the top, that the recent blue trend line can be back-tested at any time. There could be a further drop Sunday night, and then a retrace could start. Or there could be a retrace right out of the gate Sunday. This is very difficult to tell.

The seventh chart note is in orange in the lower left. Any movement below 4,126 would invalidate the idea of a continuation of the up move as a diagonal wave. So, watch the level carefully.

And, the Fibonacci eighth chart note was shown yesterday. It is the placement of the Bollinger Bands, and the 18-day SMA. Sometimes, those levels are respected enough by the trading algorithms to provide some decent temporary support and resistance.

Again, the primary purpose of this post is simply to let readers know that I try to avoid drinking the Cool-aid in either direction, and stay neutral of mindset until we see a good series of lower lows and lower highs on the daily swing line, with daily price bias below the 18-day SMA, with some price length in the waves.

This is the second post this weekend, and if you have not seen the first one, yet, you may wish to review it now.

Have a good rest of the weekend.

TraderJoe

65 comments:

  1. Nice weight of the evidence. Trade what we see, not what we think? :o) Thanks!

    Here's a different view in terms of M2 (update of prior) - (long term)

    https://www.mediafire.com/view/esnu54ar24qiwxo/SPXM2.PNG/file

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I find amazing is the velocity of money is still in a down trend after briefly going up during COVID and that’s with trillions of of stimulus and fed liquidity. Might mean rates are not going up much even with high inflation? As they say - we shall see.

      Delete
    2. Yes! Ratio of nominal GDP to the money supply has been steadily declining as has been top and bottom line revenues for quite some time. Nevertheless, we are seeing historic highs in Market cap to GDP. I do not think it is sustainable. I suspect the bond vigilantes will ultimately put in an appearance but unless and until they do, the part continues apace. Looks to me like we are in some kind of fourth wave. I have a third shorter than wave one so I think a day of reckoning is swiftly approaching.

      Delete
    3. FRED only released Q1 M2 velocity. Q3 it went up and Q4 / Q1 2021 it went down. This doesn't mean that the amount of money changing hands has gone down though (GDP), it means that the money that is out there is changing hands less frequently. Having said that, I'm pretty sure there was a big spike in velocity as Q2 started up. The Fed promptly did reverse repo to suck cash out of the banks, as well as selling their ETFs.

      But to that point, there is something very strange about an environment where housing prices are shooting 'to the moon' while house sales and new construction plummets. Supply chain issues fine, but why. Did all the lumbermills go broke or something? We can't make enough concrete now, are they still in lockdown or something? Everyone is hiring but no one is taking? Something is seriously wrong and no one seems to be asking the correct questions.

      Delete
    4. BLK bidding 20-30% above market price for residential real estate is partly to blame for current price skew imo.

      Delete
  2. TLT/SPY (2day) - Will be interesting to monitor this ratio in the weeks to come

    https://www.mediafire.com/view/lmqe1zoew4j3o70/tltspy.PNG/file

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will we see 1% ten year before 2%. SUMTINGWONG!!!

      Delete
    2. I would not be surprised by 3% first!

      Delete
    3. Here's one way you might see 3% first :o)

      https://www.mediafire.com/view/nuxrm1k0rnpez2m/TNX.PNG/file

      Delete
    4. Nice! There are also other subtle macro-economic signals sounding a cautionary note.Yellen is not stupid. Duplicitous yes. Stupid no. Her recent comment about higher rates was no mis-speak, her hasty retreat notwithstanding. Therein lies her duplicity. She knows what's coming, and frankly so should anyone paying attention!

      Delete
  3. Unbiased analysis..thanks TJ.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have been thinking about this question of confirmation bias and interest rates offer interrsting food for thought. We look at run-away inflation and ask ourselves how on earth can rates remain this low? Remarkably, some even argue they are going lower! A few years ago there was even talk of negative rates a la the ECB. (Euro of course a younger currency and still only a fraction of global dollar denominated debt.) Why is this? I would argue normalcy bias. Rates have remained low for so long even when circumstances scream "abnormal!", we maintain our bias of expectation. The same thing is true of equity prices. We all understand prices precisely track the FED balance sheet but is what we have been seeing NORMAL?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it is more mechanical in nature. The Fed buys treasuries, these are like any other security the market price for the treasury is set by supply/demand. Yield goes in the opposite direction of price. This is artificial demand, yield would be much higher if the Fed were not buying. Just think what would happen to say the cost of Beef if the Fed started buying $120B in beef every month. That is what they are doing to treasuries - makes the price of the bond go up, and the rate go down. With that type of mass direct manipulation, I don't think interest rates have much if any meaning. Certainly not the same meaning they used to have say 15 years ago.

      Delete
    2. I agree. The fed YTD has bought 900 billion of treasury’s and MBS. The CB’s around the world will be manipulating rates lower for a long time to come because their governments can’t afford high rates.

      Delete
  5. Good morning all. ES 8-hr, just exceeded the 4,279 low.

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TJ - the wave down from 4368 appears to be a 3/ C wave to me ?

      Delete
    2. Looking a lot like the earlier 5-wave count was a '1' or maybe an 'a' wave to me. A:D is 0.13 This is broad and deep.

      Delete
  6. 8hr - early look -

    https://www.mediafire.com/view/t3ue309cvvmxfk2/8hr.PNG/file

    ReplyDelete
  7. ES 8-Hr : fyi - the prior 15 June 2021 high has been tagged and exceeded lower by a bit at 4,258.00

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. see below. From here forward, please translate to English (Google translate is ok), so that I don't need too. Thanks in advance.

      TJ

      Delete
  8. ES 8-hr: as a downward retrace wave, price is below the 50% retrace, and could be on the way to 62%, 78% or more. But the wave 'does not' have to be a retrace wave.

    https://www.tradingview.com/x/jI7AV67S/

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
  9. ES 15-min: I know it might seem hard to swallow, but this 'can' still be wave v of the diagonal, as follows. There is not a good reversal bar yet.

    https://invst.ly/vg-yi

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Treasury yields are dropping through the floor. Panic flight to safety.

      Delete
  10. I am beginning to see bottom like divergences, and compressed overlapping patterns common to 5th waves on 5 min and below charts using RSI. I think we need to see similar patterns on 30 min and 1 hr charts for the short term low though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just to add, the NASDAQ Composite got to within 5-6 points of its 50EMA before the decline initially stopped. Obviously this is a significant resistance point on NAS.

      Delete
  11. ES 1-Hr, there is not even a well-formed hourly reversal candle yet, and follow-through. The moving averages are still pointed lower. First sign of an upward retrace would be trading up and over the upper parallel trend line.

    https://invst.ly/vh0ac

    A reversal candle 'could' form soon, but it would need to form with a follow through candle, too.

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This bounce on ES looks weaker than the one on NASDAQ. I can barely tell RSI divergence on 5 min, have to go to 2 and 1 min. All of this looks to me like it needs at least one more punch down.

      Delete
    2. Also S&P Cash at its 50EMA.

      Delete
  12. https://www.tradingview.com/x/dwgZzGon/ TQQQ Daily chart

    We could get a retest of the break lower, the gap down could hold, a right shoulder might form - all these things are possible but I plan to maintain a bearish view until the 30 minute 200 MA (daily close line) is breached back to the upside. I think the safer bet at the moment is that we are in Wave A or Wave 1 Down with a Wave B or 2 to follow - "at any time" or on another day from now. The sell off is intense enough that we will likely need slowing momentum - a bounce that lasts a full day or more - and a retest of the low on a subsequent day. That would be a firm signal for Wave B or 2 to commence.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've noticed that sometimes a "C" wave of a corrective has little or no divergence on momentum indicators. I know we aren't supposed to be in a C but thought I'd mention that.

      Delete
    2. There is a non confirmation of the highs by the Dow and now this move lower - that is a traditionally powerful Dow theory sell signal.

      Delete
    3. Oh I think the top is in. I'm just talking about what's going to happen over the next couple of days and weeks.

      Delete
  13. TJ
    This could also be a possibility

    https://ibb.co/ypxTqrM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No. It is not a possibility because the "supposed" smaller degree b wave is larger in both price and time than it's supposed larger degree 1 wave. Please do not post such things as it will confuse my readers that are trying to learn correct degree labeling.

      TJ

      Delete
    2. its not the smaller degree subwave. I am counting from the "TOP".

      Delete
    3. "b" is a smaller symbol than "1". Get it? Therefore, "b" CAN NOT be longer in price or longer in time than "1". Get it ?

      Delete
  14. The next fib turn date is 7-26. That would be a nice set up for new money trade. Not my work though.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Looks to me like flagging price action on vol instruments. We have had so many instances of sharp declines being ferociously bought and reversed a widespread pavlovian response could be in play. A genuine bull flag means VIX takes out today's high imo...

    ReplyDelete
  16. SPY (wkly) to reach the 34ema, currently around 400 (just below the May lows) -
    just a point of reference.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Just fyi - lower daily Bollinger Band and 62% retrace align at 4,225.
    TJ

    ReplyDelete
  18. It looks to me like the needed momentum divergences are forming on multiple indexes. This should make a short term bottom soon on multiple indexes. This corresponds to TJ's labelling of a slightly lower low / bottom retest @ 10:20am.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just fyi .. there is 4,225; the lower daily Bollinger Band, and 62%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paraphrasing Ira .. "the first hit of the lower band is 'often' (not always) where the Smart Money takes some off the table..because the probability of staying below the band is 'roughly' 5%. Also, this is a place where he would recommend no 'new' shorts. Some portion can be left on the table to see if it runs".

      This is not to be taken as trading or investment advice -- just passing along how a commodities broker often sees it & teaches it.

      TJ

      Delete
    2. by "Smart Money takes some of the table", you mean short positions right? But definitely no new shorts should be added.

      Thanks

      Delete
  20. Lower VIX high on lower market low often indicative of fifth down.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks tj,

    Have we filled all the opening gaps ?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bull flag target on vol proxies not quite met. Slightly higher VIX high may be indicating only three down complete thus far.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This small degree 5-wave shows on the NASDAQ as well, but on NASDAQ it failed to make a new low. On SP cash it did make a new low. So 5th wave failure, or something more sinister?

    https://i.imgur.com/mcw6xwi.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That failure on nasdaq :

      https://i.imgur.com/ktIKOsd.jpg

      Delete
  24. https://www.tradingview.com/x/7B916fPn/

    A bottom is "trying to form" but we could be in the middle of an acceleration channel as well. I would hold off any longs until there is more evidence of strength to the upside. Let's see how things open tomorrow because there are ways that this can extend no matter what indicators are showing.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Sd .. please stop with the trading advice, i.e. "hold off on longs" or I will have to begin deleting the posts. I have been consistent about this with everyone. Not singling you out. Thanks in advance.

      TJ

      Delete
    2. Sorry, I've read your blog rules but can't help opining on what I wish for sometimes. I'll stop.

      Delete
  25. This is my take on the SPY count.

    https://www.tradingview.com/x/8njEZPBc/

    One 'might' be able to count it as just "a-b-c", but then where-o-where is the 'b' wave after the first diagonal. Rather, the EMA-34 indicates, "it's all just one wave".

    Also, the diagonal at the low is is of a 'smaller degree' than the whole diagonal in its entirety, so it is allowed by the principle of alternation.

    Is the down move necessarily done? Not necessarily. The spike at the end of the day could be the start of a 'flat' that produces lower lows overnight.

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. c of (v) > a x 3.618. Seems pretty hefty. :o)

      Delete
  26. A new post is started for the next day.

    ReplyDelete