The larger parallel channel upward cracked a bit today. Price can still move lower; prices can then also back-test the lower channel boundary. The overall weekly count is currently as shown on the chart below. While the US Federal Reserve is raising interest rates and doing QT (Quantitative Tightening) a simple bear market (five-wave-decline) would not be out of the question from a fundamental viewpoint.
ES Futures - Weekly - Flat Count |
Again, in trying to keep the degrees of the wave count correct, if we had three Intermediate waves as a flat to the Covid-19 low (lower left) as Primary [A], and a triple zigzag each of Intermediate degree to the Primary [B] wave high, then if we have five Intermediate degree waves down to the about the level of Primary [A], then those would make up a Primary [C] wave down to be a Cycle a wave down of a larger flat.
Why is this termed an "optimistic" count? Because if Cycle a is a three-wave sequence, it implies a Cycle b wave that can again approach the high within 90% of the prior all time high or perhaps even go over the high. Each of these cycle waves, Cycle a, Cycle b, and an eventual Cycle c would make up a wave known as SuperCycle {IV}. Again, as I have written before, I think SuperCycle {III} ended in October 2018 for reasons I have explained.
At this point, other counts assume the FED will relent on its policy, or some other factor will come along to save equity prices. Right now those items are not in evidence. So, the count remains as it is until something not expected presents itself.
If you happen to think that a wave count like this is not possible, flat waves happen every day on smaller time scales. We have shown many of them on this blog. A flat is a very common type of sideways correction. There are others. But if you think this count is too drastic, you should see what the counts that end with a five-wave-sequence up to the high predict - much, much worse than this.
Regardless of optimistic or drastic, the count being presented is the one that can most be defended using the definitions inherent in degree labeling. At this point, there is only one other count I give almost equal weight too, but the weekly chart has to make a 62 - 78% retrace to activate it, and we are not there yet.
And, for the bulls, yes - in this count - there will be plenty of wave 2's and 4's along the way that will provide significant retraces. But, we may have seen the largest wave (2) already.
Have an excellent start to your evening.
TraderJoe
Thanks!
ReplyDeleteES (15m-(5x3)) Zeroing in on current -
https://www.mediafire.com/view/z6emtyxpvg4iibh/bothes.PNG/file
Please tell me about degree issues with a and [A] . Particularly interested in the subwaves of "a" related to the covid selloff. We are doing [A] [B] [C] and are proposing a 5 wave structure as all of [C] or a of [C]. I know that subwaves of iii are constrained by wave i, so how this play out?
ReplyDeleteOn the way down, the key degree requirement has already been met. Wave 1 is shorter in price & time than (1), and wave 2 is shorter in price and time than (2). Wave three's can grow by extension provided the extended waves become of increasingly smaller degree. TJ.
Deleteok a is smaller degree than [A] what can we say about subwaves of a
Deleteno, cycle 'a' is a 'larger' degree than Primary [A]. Please check.
DeleteTJ
SPX - only 2% of stocks are above 20 dma. That’s wash out levels
ReplyDeleteCPCE - Ticked down to .84
DeleteTJ, a question -- is it common for the C wave of an irregular flat to be a complex :3 wave?
ReplyDeleteThere is some risk of that, but in that case: [A] = [W], [B] = [Y], and [C] = [Z] all as three-wave sequences. However, [Z], must then be (A), (B), (C) where the ending (C) is in five-waves.
DeleteTJ
A three wave structure for primary A of cycle 4 would indeed suggest a flat wave under-way with a minimum 90% retrace of the decline off the ATHs, and new ATHs in the case of an expanded flat. Considering the carnage in so many individual index components, even a 90% re-trace would be remarkable, even with stellar performance from the most heavily weighted componemts.
ReplyDeleteToday ended up being the highest negative volume day since the Jan peak. Climax selling? (short term if nothing else?).
ReplyDeleteYeah. VIX divergent lower high, if it sticks, would suggest a fifth down completed today.
DeleteBTC (750x3) Target area reached -
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_ec63445eeb5e4bd8458a6edc0f75dd54.png
ES (5x3) - Current early look -
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_7f5f35d1e9112d95b42dce15317e5be9.png
It could just be my lack of understanding - if it is forgive me - but it seems this chart misuses the term DBBO on the right shoulder. In other words, the last column of O's never had an uptick or 'x's to claim it was indeed a bottom. Therefore, the term 'double-bottom' seems meaningless in that case. It may be a reason the short-term chart 'breakouts' are getting whipped around. Just my thoughts.
DeleteTJ
The DBBO refers to the double bottom breakout of the two most recent "O" columns, where the horiz line is. When the "O"s were both at this line, it was a double btm, then broke down below the line (breakout). Hope this helps. Its a PnF thing.
DeleteI see now, according to the literature, your comment is correct. I guess that's why I'm not as big a proponent of PnF charting. I'd rather use 'fractals' on OHLC charts. TJ.
DeleteES (dly, 30m) - 4 touches, reg div (hidden) -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/m40sx6tnwzxw32w/ESRDh.PNG/file
On the wkly chart posted above, would we not want the 2nd (X) to overlap A of (Y)?
ReplyDeleteIn a 'linear' triple zigzag (i.e. one in a channel), yes, ideally. But there is not even a 'rule' for that. In a wedge shape, not so sure. TJ.
DeleteES 30-min: one valid triangle can be counted. This chart is a little behind, but a new "bar low" has been formed. I'd keep an eye on those fractals.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/cEl46TIq/
TJ
ES 30-min: intraday screen, breakdown to a new daily low; swing line continues lower currently under the 18-day SMA. (TradingView chart is behind).
ReplyDeleteTJ
Here is the TradingView chart showing the lower low & triangle. (Fractals temporarily hidden). Any lower low would likely be the third wave of a fifth wave. Any higher high would likely be a flat.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/nK8BFgvl/
TJ
fyi - just a reminder than price is against the lower daily Bollinger Band, a place where Ira indicates "the Smart Money often takes some profit off the table, especially if the daily slow stochastic is in just over-sold territory." (Not trading or investment advice - just a paraphrase of an item Ira Epstein teaches.)
ReplyDeleteTJ
Transports showing strength today, they showed weakness before everything tanked fwiw.
ReplyDeleteES & SPY through their lows, again. TJ
ReplyDeleteES (5x3) - New low
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_a821ffece1b894f9a086acc706ed2d59.png
BTC - On the mend?
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_05beea574b06e3abb1d0ef62b378d0d4.png
I'd call that a band-aid after a cluster bomb attack.
Deleteusoil showing weakness against indexes today - that's different.
ReplyDeleteSPY 5-min: getting very difficult to count. Either a diagonal fifth or a "b" wave/
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/gR3rvHAC/
TJ
I would watch closely the high labeled ((4)). TJ.
DeleteRBOB - (0.025x3) Measured move to initial target?
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_117e316808df97f23ba1c0c9eff6b0df.png
ES/SPY 5-min.. have the new lower low. Only good for so far, as indicated.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/rMsIpKOA/
TJ
RUT-ROH SPY busted it's diagonal measurement. Can be a larger "b" wave, or the thrust from a triangle. TJ
DeleteDJI (150x3) - Current
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_e4c10be5b8e24c616913f27b753248fb.png
ES (5x3) - Current
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_18d7e2e7240510b909901dbf7f5ba427.png
A new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ