Below is the ES 2-Daily chart which is only provided so the degree labels of the current wave count can be determined. The degree labels are actually based on the Dow's locations BUT the ES may have its recent Minor 1 low located on the 2 May low or a slightly lower low. Then, wave Minor 2 is still corrective to Minor 1 and 1 is shorter than (1). As it stands now, the new minute ((i)) is shorter in price and time than the prior minor 1 in the same direction thus qualifying as another sub-wave.
ES Futures - 2 Day - Degree Labels |
Price is currently below the lower parallel trend line - gray dashed - of the base channel as shown. Remember, as Elliott taught, the base channel is drawn from 0-to-(2) of whichever wave degree is being considered and an initial parallel is placed on (1). It is now in the magenta acceleration channel which is drawn from (2) to 2, with an initial parallel also placed on (1). As long as prices remain in the acceleration channel, then an impulse count attempt remains in effect. Price may take a relatively large price excursion upward for a minute ((ii)) wave, up. If so, any lower low following minute ((ii)) would likely be a third wave, minute ((iii)) and may serve to extend Intermediate wave (3) lower.
A Minor 3 wave can expand significantly as long as the interior wave sequences become of increasingly smaller degree. Sometimes - because of gaps - this becomes very difficult to gauge.
Let's see how it goes.
Have a good rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe
AHT (mthly) - Problem(s) ?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/2xvr40zmwzwpdov/AHT.PNG/file
Note: Log scale
DeleteProblems? Almost everything. I really don't like doing this, but in the spirit of education:
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/B4cRWQsc/
1. 'Always' start with the lowest low, or highest high for perspective.
2. Note the "price length" relationships of the wave.
3. 'More-often-than-not' wave ((4)) will be 'very long in time'.
One of your errors is that your claimed minute ((ii)) which is a 'smaller degree' than the claimed larger degree Minor 2, is actually bigger than Minor 2. This is a degree violation of the type I have been writing about for a very long time. It's simple: larger degree waves must actually 'be' larger than smaller degree waves. Enough for now..
TJ
Almost everything. Umm. Just for all of those in here, this count came via the boys at EWI. Apparently Mr. Prechter didn't review this (or perhaps he did). The point is, this came from an organization that literally "wrote the book" on EW. Yet, almost everything is wrong with this count. So, please don't feel bad at all for not "getting it"! You apparently are in so called "good" company. This highlights the problem with EW.
DeleteI'm sorry that it took this type of approach to highlight the issue, but it needs highlighting! Perhaps this will give you a "better" perspective on EW. Just something to keep in mind. Eliminating the subjectivity to the point that 3 analysts provide the same count (subwaves and all) would be a good start (for me at least).
TJ - thanks for taking the time to reply. I purposely selected this count because even I could see some issues from [your] approach to EW.
I hope this exercise has clearly highlighted the issue!
As I have written before, I 'stopped' getting any EWI publications precisely because in five separate instances I caught them not following their 'OWN published rules'. I caught them red-handed. They published counts based on the violations that made certain predictions and their count DID NOT come to pass.
DeleteWhy did they do this? Sloppiness, ego and a need to publish 'dire predictions' to sell newsletters.
I wrote them about it. I told them about it. I offered to meet with them in person (for the good of 'their' organization). They refused to listen. Their counts suffered. The bottom line: they made predictions from counts that broke the rules, and their predictions did not come to pass. That means clients lost money.
There are 'so many ' EW analysts not following the rules that no wonder all the counts are different. It is really quite logical that if you have ten different people, and they 'are counting the way they want', not rigorously following a specific rule base, they almost 'must' arrive at the 10 different answers.
TJ
Can't recall how many times I confronted Steve Hochberg on truly egregious counts that even a rank amateur like myself recognised as totally bogus. EWI should read Elliott Wave INCOMPETENCE!
DeleteThanks very much for this work
ReplyDeletewelcome. TJ.
DeleteBTC (300x3) - current look
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_b8d7a8a683fedaac4ba8015c0cdebbb3.png
I have a pitchfork median line target of around 16k, probably overshoot to 15k. Too many still very optimistic - just look through #bitcoin on twitter. Very little panic yet.
DeleteCop/Gld ratio vs TNX -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/kcgtqtmnul9brlv/copgldratio.PNG/file
HG (0.025x3) - Copper top?
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_e2e5f0d409048ad63a147febb5758bf2.png
https://schrts.co/nYTeDKXH
ReplyDeleteYield curve update.
Inversion is inevitable IMHO. the fed can’t control supply so they are going to destroy demand by raising rates to far. Boom and bust cycle continues. We would be better off abolishing the fed and letting the bond market set rates.
DeleteBarrick Gold (mthly) Observations -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/edw4y9gccxxk30y/Barrick.PNG/file
BTC - Target of 17700 has now been reached. I have a continuation horiz target (not shown on above chart) of 16500, then the vertical of 15300.
ReplyDeleteUpdated chart with several nearby horizontals, as well as one some distance below current level (for reference).
Deletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_946106c8e1bef778c0ca2efd7382f847.png
10yr yield - (0.1x3) - Update, next target area
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/7eacnoy93hoz5bc/10yr0.1x3.PNG/file
4% looks like a good target and resistance area
DeleteBear market rallies- (click to sharpen)
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/ymvcbdg4fdlbxxw/Brallies.PNG/file
XLE (wkly) - thoughts
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/5fkj7mtlv9chk54/xle%25282%2529.PNG/file
GDX (dly) More to go?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/s90wm1q9o3r2lbj/GDX.PNG/file
For me, a much clearer picture (0.25x3)
Deletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_a3a62752c475716756087ebd9a18841d.png
https://schrts.co/WAPTjGAH
ReplyDeleteSPX - stocks above 50 dma at 2%. This number has been lower on only four different times since ‘06. We usually see a bounce when we are so oversold.
We have a fib turn date on Sunday 6-26. That’s 89 days from 3-29 high. I will give it a couple trading days on either side.
DeleteDXY (mthly) - Three things
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/ng8vme2r2v3amy7/DXYmthly.PNG/file
BTC (300x3) Update
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_562d832e06d3759e2cb655379acba79a.png
GDX/SPX (1x3) - A different way to view relative strength
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/nmwm8rpn7bxnbur/gdxspx.PNG/file
ES (5x3) Can we "break on through to the other side" ?
ReplyDeletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_ee4d23c9fff3a2239e35878e322030ca.png
ES (2hr) - A possible -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/ldgv1sxbxmz41i6/ESrdhposs.PNG/file
ES (5x3) - A possible
Deletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_171596251a2412cd4d055a8f669644d7.png
ES (5x3) Morning update -
Deletehttps://tvc-invdn-com.investing.com/data/tvc_a0f55ee57ae076e10b3a8c884f84a0c0.png
ES (2hr) - Morning update - same comments as above
Deletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/xm47lt0gnfzglng/ESmornupdate.PNG/file