We said that the upcoming Minor B wave could literally be any corrective sequence. This includes a zigzag, or multiple zigzag, a triangle or a flat. Like it or not, one of the market's most frustrating tricks is to make a flat wave. Let's first examine this excerpt in the ES 4-Hr futures from the March 22 bottom.
ES Futures - 4 Hr - Flat |
If you examine this chart closely, after the first five-waves-up, you can see the three-wave structure, down to a, the three-wave structure up to b, and the five waves down to c. Wave b 'just' nicks over the top. As much as one would like to prove anything in Elliott Wave work, would you like to prove-out to the extent possible that this is a flat? OK. Here are some key concepts.
- It is wave ((5)) that is as long as wave ((1)), not wave b. One key measurement for an Elliott wave is that very often - when the third wave is extended - the fifth wave equals the first wave in length. This fits like a glove. In the above sequence, the third wave ((3)) is the extended wave.
- One of the only ways an Elliott Wave makes five-waves down, as with c, without further waves lower, is at the end of a FLAT. (Another way is five-waves of a c wave in a zigzag or a triangle).
- Without this flat, the down wave would not have exceeded the time of the up wave.
The analyst would normally expect the down wave to exceed the prior wave ((4)) low, except in this case - which is the case of the "truncated flat". The truncation calls for a stronger market in the opposite direction. You can see the gap up at 2,500 on the right of the chart above. Off it goes, and so far, price has not revisited this low.
Now let's put this chart in larger context.
ES Futures - 4 Hr - Flat in Context |
So, the flat wave in the first chart, above, is minute wave ((ii)) of the Minor A wave above. The gap up is in the third wave. If the flat is wave ((ii)), then the running triangle is wave minute ((iv)) for alternation. After the fifth wave up of Minor A, then it appears we have three waves down as (c) = 2.618 x (a) with dead-on Fibonacci ratios.
And since that time, we have had three waves up. The waves are currently unlabeled. Could these three waves end here? Yes, they could to start a multiple zigzag lower. But, if there is a gap up Sunday night, then they could also continue back to the high, or near to the high (90% by EW 'rule') to make the minute ((b)) wave of a FLAT wave, to be followed by a likely minute ((c)) wave down to end Minor B.
Such a flat wave could go over the top and even make an expanded flat lower, to give the down wave more time and more length than the current 23% retrace.
The market knows were watching, and it is dragging things out in the correction as much as possible. That's what corrections do. It is interesting that the EWO is about as flat as a pancake here. Is it possible the market is getting ready to do another one of its most frustrating tricks?
Have a good start to your weekend.
TraderJoe
Wanted to say thanks again! Have a great weekend.
ReplyDeletenice post. have a great weekend.
ReplyDeleteregards
joske vermeulen
Thanks!
DeleteThanks for the detailed analysis. Have a wonderful weekend.
ReplyDelete..welcome.
DeleteCash has legitimately reached the 90% level, upward, and can qualify for the "((b))" wave of a flat. Waiting to see if futures will do the same. Nothing wrong with a minute ((b)) - if that's what is is - wave going over the high.
ReplyDeletehttps://invst.ly/ql9-v
TJ
ES futures are currently at 2,864, and need 2,868 to make the 90% level. If so, this is how the minute ((b)) wave would likely count.
Deletehttps://invst.ly/qlaf0
The alternation is that minuet (w) has a long a, and a short c. And minuet (y) would have a short a, and a long c.
TJ
There is 2,868, and 2,872 is equality. Could go a bit beyond, also.
DeleteI think you mentioned an expanded flat as a possibility...
ReplyDelete..yes..also a possibility.
Delete1. No change; negative prices for CL allowed by exchanges.
ReplyDelete2. Could this? and could that? Since writing the article about The Eight Fold Methodology, I have advocated for a consistent method of counting the Elliott Wave. The above chart shows the count. The chart at this link shows the rationale.
https://invst.ly/qkpr2
FIRST, find the time frame that places 120 - 160 candles on the chart. In this chart, that is the 4-hr time frame with 110 candles. Any smaller time frame (like 2 hr) results is 200 candles, so 110 is the best fit. SECOND, plot the Elliott Wave Oscillator. THIRD, note how wave two goes below the zero line, then find the peak after the peak in the third wave. The only trick in this case is that in an extended first wave, the first wave has the greatest momentum. (You find just the reverse when it is the fifth wave that extends, not the first or the third). FOURTH. Look for the EWO to go to +10% - 40% of the peak reading in w3. This chart does that with the peak at ~140, then wave four is at 10 - which is greater than 10% (14 would have worked. It went lower - which is fine). FIFTH, plot the EMA-34 look for contact in for all of the waves. SIXTH look for a Fibonacci ratio for wave 3. It is exactly 78.6% x w1. SEVENTH - look for alternation in wave 4. It is a running triangle, versus the flat in wave 2. Triangle in wave 4 provides alternation for any type of second wave because second wave 'can never' be a triangle by EW rule. EIGHT - look for divergence for wave 5.
So, why might you ask me to over-rule what are largely objective criteria? By what objective criteria are you assessing w-x-y? The only criteria I know for w-x-y are y = 100% x w, AND 'often' trade in a parallel channel AND each 'must' be a clear zigzag. There is no parallel channel on the chart. And I don't see two 'clear' zigzags.
TJ
ET, Are you at b of 5 of contracting diagonal on gold?
ReplyDeletejoe, i understand i think how 123 is abc, then it turns into an impulse.
ReplyDeleteBut what about wxy - it seems the specific count shouldn't allow it to do so - - its 3 3 3. so its a rather temporary count in that regards versus abc which can be relabeled as 1 2 3?
not questioning cunt just thinking how things evolve
Deletew-x-y can only turn into a diagonal, not an impulse.
Delete1. It must ADD x-z
2. It must be expanding or contracting as the nature of the diagonal.
so basically you can make good money just shorting at 3:49 every day and covering at 3:51 - got it.
ReplyDeleteyeah i was looking at that too, but today there wasn't much movement
DeleteWhats so special about 3:49?
Delete@Mahesh .. at 3:50, Interactive Brokers requires all clients to add "full margin", and not just trade on day-trading margins until the end of the day. That one minute has seen 10 - 35 points of volatility in LESS than the one minute.
DeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDelete