Sunday, April 28, 2019

A Very Simple Situation

It is quite true when writing a market blog that many people want to know your "long term" view without bothering to wonder what is around the next corner first. While I do not claim to be a market Nostradamus, the immediate situation does not have to be anywhere near that mystical or exciting.

Below is a chart of the NASDAQ 100 futures (NQ) on a fifteen minute basis. As most market participants know by now, it would be hard to see the market going down without this sector failing, and probably first. So, instead of looking at daily charts and groaning over the longer term chart again, let's look at this chart of the short run, instead.

NASDAQ 100 (NQ) Futures - 15 Minutes - Simplified

This chart makes life so easy it almost hurts. The chart is currently of an expanding double-zigzag downward. Those two zigzags are labeled as w-x-y in red near the separation line of the indicator panel. As important as the expansion in price (with y being longer than w in price) is the expansion in time. The second zigzag takes much more time than the first.

Then, after these two zigzags, there appears to be another zigzag upward, based on where prices stopped for the week. But we caution, this up wave has not proven to be over, yet. The only thing the up wave has proven is that it, too, is longer in time and longer in price than the prior upward wave marked as (ii) or x.

Yes, you guessed it. IF the high of 7,855 holds, then this pattern can begin to shape up as an expanding diagonal downward of the 3-3-3-3-3 variety. But, this pattern is on a razor thin margin! IF the pattern holds, then more lower lows might be expected. But, because of the razor thin margin, if the high of 7,855 is exceeded, it simply means there is more upward price movement to be expected. What is very nice about the potential pattern, however, is the deepness of the retrace waves. This deep type of wave is what is generally expected in an expanding diagonal. So far, so good.

Try to remember that Tuesday of this week is the last trading day of the month which often, not always, brings some sloppiness due to month-end window-dressing. And then Wednesday would be the first day of a new trading month - which we have written before often, not always, results in positive inflows.

But right now, the task is ridiculously simple: watch the overnight futures for clues on whether this pattern breaks or holds. The task is to find a valid Elliott pattern, and, until then, just be flexible and patient in wave counting.

I'll have more to say on the long run in the future.
Have a good rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe

P.S. The NASDAQ 100 futures did have an invalidation of a few points in the overnight session. And that little invalidation now tells us a LOT about the current count. See chart below.

NASDAQ 100 Futures (NQ) - 4 HR - Extended First Wave

Because there is only a double zigzag downward from ((iii)), we now know to potentially expect higher highs. There is now an impulse up in the futures from the wave labeled as ((iv)). So, the count is of an extended first wave, with a retrace for wave ((ii)) of much less than a 38.2%. But wave ((ii)) is longer in time than wave ((i)). Wave ((iii)) is shorter than wave ((i)) and stopped at the level of 78.6% x ((i)).

Wave ((iv)) is a clear double zigzag that alternates with the flat double-combination for wave ((ii)). IF, for some reason, new highs are not obtained, though I expect they will be, then the current impulse up is the failure or truncation wave ((v)). Remember, Wednesday could see first of the month inflows from pension funds, 401k's, etc. Wave ((v)) would need to remain shorter than wave ((iii)).

16 comments:

  1. hi Joe
    not so simple since we do not know when we will have reached the top of the rise

    ReplyDelete
  2. TA
    perhaps something like this
    https://imgur.com/rX3J6RA
    if so we need to get to lower right hand side of rectangle to avoid violations

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Joe

    I follow your blog as much as I can, but due to little time, I can not always read everything.
    I am not a trader but find Elliott wave analysis very interesting and helpful to try to analyse human behavior.

    Now I had a little spare time because I had some days off of work and started reading some unread posts.

    Just to be clear:
    on November 4th 2018, in your fabulous blog post " Confidence Level of a Down Market" you wrote:
    "As a result of measurement, I have one count. We have finished Minor 5 of Intermediate (5) at the October 2018 high
    (see second chart, below), and we have made minute wave ((i)) down, and are now in the correction for the minute ((ii))
    wave; and likely just the (b) wave of minute ((ii) with a (c) wave upward still likely.
    In case you didn't read all of the comments from Friday's post, today I thought I would outline the single biggest
    reason why one might have confidence that a true bear slide is beginning."

    As I recall correctly, you also label the 2009 low as Primary 4, so oktober 2018 high would be Primary 5?

    But then now I read you stating in the comments of your blog post "Base Channels and Outsized B Waves" :
    Elliott_Trader April 24, 2019 at
    7:33 PM
    None. As far as I can tell, it is a
    'larger degree' fourth wave. Not a
    smaller degree one. That's not
    going to play well in Peoria.

    and

    Elliott_Trader April 25, 2019 at
    8:55 AM
    No. I have been looking for a
    "larger degree" wave since the
    October high. It was only a question
    of how the larger degree fourth
    wave started - with a :3 or a :5.
    Fourth waves can start with either.
    This one started with a :3. Still on
    track.

    This made me want to ask if I missed something? Are we not correcting the Primary 5 top now? Minor A of intermediary 1 already done with the December 2018 low. And now still working on Minor B up (maybe finished), with after this wave, a Minor C wave down to finish Intermediate 1?

    Thank you for your patience and your fantastic lectures in Elliott labeling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kobajashi; you are welcome for the posts. I'm not looking for an Intermediate wave (1) down, although I am at some point looking for a C wave decline, after this B wave up. I'll explain more later.

      Delete
  4. Thanks Joe. A lot of bullishness all around, but the "sell in may" season is very near... Interesting week ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  5. New all time high on SPX500USD (cfd) overnight.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joe
    NDX futures triangle in Jan-Apr 2018
    look at B wave
    good example - -over the top and hard to count as impulse

    ReplyDelete
  7. From a reference in a prior post, I was looking at Mr. Neely's recent assessment from 2016 on. I found one aspect particularly interesting. Just an observation.

    https://imgur.com/ENAsbEC

    ReplyDelete
  8. A post-script and chart has been added to today's post.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In the following chart, I've tried to be as clear as possible.

    Thanks!

    https://imgur.com/d58dAtP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The count that allowed for the new high was ((a)), ((b)), ((c)) to A:3 instead of to 1. That's all there is to it. I'll comment no more on this topic.

      Delete
  10. Would there be any problem with this being 1 of a contracting ED in SPX since early 2015?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. or blow off top time like the big shot on the Stratosphere.

      Delete