It is usually price length that will actually invalidate a count. Thus far, nothing has invalidated the price lengths, upward. The ES/SPX hourly triangle count we were working may have played out in this fashion. As you can see - even yet - the typical technical target for the triangle pattern still isn't achieved. That typical technical target for a contracting triangle is the widest width of the triangle added to the breakout point. It comes into play around 5,300 or before.
That leaves wave iv as a slightly truncated flat, with an impulse following. It is very hard for me to tell the difference between these two counts, although the triangle is slightly preferred because the timing was exceptionally close to accommodate the FOMC meeting results.
But, from everything I can see since Thursday, nothing in this index/futures count has had a length invalidation yet.
Have an excellent rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe
and will the primary 3rd wave finally end afterwards...
ReplyDeletetriangles 'usually' precede the last wave in a sequence. TJ.
DeleteThis price action puts me in truncation alert
DeleteI think David may have been asking if the next higher degree above the triangle is (near the end of) a 3rd wave primary. Or perhaps instead a 5th (so v of 5 ....). I've seen both ideas floating around.
DeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ