Sometimes the market looks you in the face and says, "Don't Argue". Such it is with the Elliott Wave count in monthly GOLD futures, below.
From the Fibonacci ratio of (3) = 2.618 x (1), to the exact 50% retrace of wave (4) on wave (3); from the peak of the RSI on wave (3), to the lack of overlap between (4) and (1), to the current monthly divergence of the RSI on wave (5). The market says, "Don't argue". But in addition, we note there IS a kind of alternation in this count. Wave (2) is a "Running Flat" - in which case "running waves" argue for "Great Strength" to follow the wave. There was great strength following that wave (2); a 2.618 wave (3). And, to alternate, wave (4) was a "Regular Flat" - not as much alternation as one would like, but some. From the Fibonacci ruler on the left, price has now touched 1.382 x wave ③ which is a common target for either "B" waves or fifth waves.
Next, when we look at wave (5), we see it did make a higher high. And the "breakout" now has everyone extolling GOLD's virtues. Now? Not in 2016 - a Fibonacci eight years ago - when GOLD bottomed??!!
OK. So, let's do a real time experiment. IF we are in a wave (5), then the three most likely Fibonacci ratios for this wave are a, (5) = (1), b, (5) = 0.618 x [net (1)-to-(3)], and c, (5) = (3). So now let's draw a blank chart of GOLD and see what we get when we add a Fibonacci ruler.
First, the reader should verify that price is already past (5) = (1). Second, the chart above shows the relationship of 0.618 x net [(1)-to-(3)] comes in at 2,263. Meanwhile the price high last week was 2,257. Hmm. That is awfully close. OK.
The problem for alert readers is this. Although there 'may be' an ending diagonal in formation, there is no proof of a turn yet. So let's look at a weekly chart in Gold. And now the problem should become a bit more clear.
One could make the case that since wave 3 is at least 0.618 x 1, the diagonal may be ending. Granted. But also, we see that wave 4 was not a clear zigzag. It may have truncated being an omen of strength. OK. But neither does 3 exceed the length of 1, yet. So, keep in mind the measurement - which readers should perform - that, if 5 in the black count exceeds 2,325 then the fifth wave may not be forming a diagonal.
On a fundamental note, we note that GOLD's price has been rising in the face of FED's interest rate hikes. Is that the way it supposed to work? Paying no dividends, GOLD carries storage charges and costs of ownership. The higher interest rates are supposed to dissuade one from owning Gold. Any number of people are now saying that Gold will skyrocket when the FED begins to lower interest rates. Really? Doesn't that fly in the face of what just happened? Word has it that this rise in GOLD has been on the backs of (other) Central Banks themselves buying unprecedented amounts of Gold in order to fight off sanctions from the U.S. and other countries if things should begin to deteriorate. Charts do show that CB's have been heavy purchasers of Gold. Well, that's the story, anyway.
In any case, the patterns are intriguing but one should not argue with the measurements.
Have an excellent rest of the day, and the long weekend.
TraderJoe
Exactly what I got. Nice to see another eyeballs on the same thing. Have a great weekend.
ReplyDeleteGood news, you too! TJ.
DeleteHi TJ - How deep of a retracement would you expect in gold if wave 5 is completing? Thanks and Happy Easter.
DeleteHi Rob, over time back to that prior Primary ((4)), circle-4, on the lower left. Again, this is after a top is confirmed. We don't have that yet. Good question. Thanks. TJ.
DeleteThanks TJ - right we need to see a reversal and see some supports taken out to downside. Thanks for the update!
DeleteI'm not there yet, primarily, because of the count on the Dow. The first chart shows the Dow's Minor A,B,C for a diagonal wave Intermediate (3).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/eiftwmcy/
The second chart shows the break of the Neely 0-2 trend line for the Dow's count. This means the triangle is likely minute ((iv)).
https://www.tradingview.com/x/1l80G6wx/
This means minute ((v)) should remain less than minute ((iii)). IF NOT, then something is wrong. Only then.
TJ
I am with you, not my primary count, and this is exactly how b waves should make me feel.
ReplyDelete..and yes, the alternate for me at this time in equities is the primary [B] wave. TJ.
DeleteGold separating from 10yr US real rates because it knows that 10yr yields being too high will send US interest expense > US tax receipts.
ReplyDeleteWere that to happen, would the US default on USTs, or print the money?
I don't want to provide a glib answer because I don't fully understand the mechanism, yet. Here is a chart I generated of Gold vs the US Dollar. First of all, while Gold has had an astonishing percentage gain, contrary to popular opinion, all the FED's printing during and after the GFC did not destroy the buck.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/kieAwIMV/
In fact, the Dollar is up about 20% since 2009. That means there is a mechanism where someone is soaking up those dollars or taking them out of the system. It may have something to do with the Dollar being the reserve currency and other countries needing to buy dollars to fund their economic growth, but I'm not sure.
Even though there certainly are periods where the Dollar is down and Gold goes up (and which have probably driven Gold's greater gain), what IS really head-turning is actually that the dollar and gold are both up at the moment. So, what does printing really do to Gold. I'm not sure.
TJ
Correlation coefficient for Gold and the Dollar is surprising to most. 😊
DeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ