US equity prices, as measured by the ES futures contract, retraced back to the lower channel line of the weekly up channel shown previously, and again in the chart below. Remember when we showed how prices were sticking to the channel before they initially collapsed lower? Well, after the gap up on Sunday night, prices rose every day this week and settled back under the underside of the channel.
As shown, prices bounced at the prior support and when the daily chart had two daily closes in-a-row below the lower daily Bollinger Band reducing the odds of the next close being outside of the band to roughly 3 - 5%, small odds. In the course of the week, as readers noted, the nested count invalidated as this wave up is too large to be a smaller degree second wave. It's good to see our blog followers are really beginning to get a handle on degree labeling. It makes writing about it worthwhile.
So, to get to the current wave count, the best valid downward count is this expanding diagonal which would be of the 3-3-3-3-3 variety as shown on the daily chart.
The price rise was very sharp, and on the daily chart the wave looks unsubdivided. So, the suspicion is that the rise is the a wave of this leg of minute-iv (circle-iv). And this wave seems to have ended - so far- at the prior support/resistance noted by the minute-i wave, the prior b wave, and the underside of the weekly channel. If so, that means a b wave lower could occur this week.
And it would be possible for such a b wave to be any of these structures: a) zigzag, b) flat, c) triangle, d) multiple zigzags, e) combination. I cover those again to indicate how much whippy trading might occur in the upcoming week. The only thing the b wave cannot do is travel below minute-iii (circle-iii).
Given the above, can prices move higher? Yes, in two ways: if the a wave is not fully complete yet or if the b wave forms as a Flat wave.
Given the above, can prices break the minute-iii (circle-iii) low? Yes, but not as the b wave. If the current low is broken it would just mean that this week's up wave is all of minute-iv (circle-iv), and the new daily low would be part of minute-v (circle-v).
In terms of minute-iv, the one thing it is not allowed to do is cross the high of minute-ii (circle-ii). This should be checked on an OHLC chart.
Because expanding diagonals tend to expand in time as well as in price, we are giving this wave much more time to develop. It could be a slog.
Have an excellent rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe
Amazing!! The dax triangle shown last week developed into an expanding diagonal. Can you please tell me whether the 5th wave of an expanding diagonal has a fibo relationship with wave 3. Thanks
ReplyDeleteThe only 'rule' for an expanding diagonal 5th wave is 5 > 3 as a zigzag. Sometimes 5 is 1.272 x 3; sometimes 5 is 1.618 x 3. Then, too, one has to look for the case where the diagonal is 'made' because 5 > 3, but, then the diagonal converts to an impulse by not making a deep retrace but letting go into a full impulse wave down. They can get very tricky, and one needs to take them wave-by-wave. Be calm, patient & flexible. TJ.
DeleteThanks for your response. Much appreciated.
DeleteExpanding diagonals have a tendency to "trap" both bears and bulls.
ReplyDeleteIs it possible for diagonals to be composed of double or triple ZZs?
ReplyDeleteAccording to the Elliott Wave Principle by Frost & Prechter, 'technically' yes. There is a 'rule' in Section 2.5 (online version) stating, quote, "Double and triple zigzags take the place of zigzags." I would just caution to make sure all the zigzags have overlaps, otherwise a double-zigzag might be "long A" with 5 of the waves, B with wave 6 and "short C" with wave 7. And this would really be just one zigzag if it doesn't have disqualifying overlaps in the A wave, and if the A wave is not a diagonal itself. TJ.
DeleteA large running flat for wave2?
ReplyDeleteNope. The 'b' wave of such a flat is larger than either of the larger degree predecessor waves in the same direction (like "1") which violates degree definitions. IF b is claimed as a smaller degree wave, it must truly be smaller than the larger degree 1 wave in price and time. TJ.
DeleteHi Tj,
ReplyDeleteDo you have an opinion about Zweig Breadth Thrust ?
https://twitter.com/McClellanOsc/status/1720439045627756551
No magic. Only what the article says, "..some of them work but with new lows first". Others work from the get-go. Still, the daily and weekly down trends would need to be broken. TJ.
DeleteSPY 10-min: just compression going on. Possible 'smaller' and 'larger' triangles or the diagonal. Equities probably waiting on signal from the bond market.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/X4ZVCd82/
TJ
Looks like consolidation of gains from last up wave. Can it be counted as a B triangle?
ReplyDeleteNo, not likely. I want to see at least a 38.2% retrace (and up to 87%) retrace of the entire wave up for a B wave. Here's where we are on the ES hourly chart.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/IM3nlAGe/
Because this morning's up wave made a 90% retrace on the high, IF this is a flat it would be a wave ④ flat (or less likely) triangle, as shown.
TJ
SPY 10-min: Measurements in cash & futures show the larger upward diagonal (alternate only) is now invalidated in both.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/touoYrOo/
TJ
Interesting SPY premarket/after hours chart has a PBar (phantom bar) strike at 430.79 seen on all time frames at 1am this morning my time (california). I have been waiting all day for it to clear but it has not. Just a strange observation.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/vvuZJMV0/
wake up and its gone
DeleteSPY 15-min : this is the alternate shown yesterday. Triangle looks better today. NQ already has the new high.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/KEa8pzye/
TJ
The triangle is now proved. Now it is just a question of it wave ⑤ extends (see red /i). It cannot extend below (e) if a triangle.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/X65ppJyc/
TJ
DOW transports and the russell are not buying into this rally.
ReplyDelete18 weekly ma at 4393 on SPX cash, no doubts in my mind it's going there and probably slightly higher
ReplyDeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ