The weekly wave chart (Neely-style) is presented below. As you know the extremely choppy downward action has made me suggest diagonals. They are very confusing. This chart helped straighten me out. Then, I went back and counted every wave since the all-time-high. One place where I was confused got resolved. As a result one should at least be on guard for an extended minute ((c)) wave of blue 4. It might be 1.618 x ((a)) or more.
ES Futures - Weekly - Wave Chart |
Now here is the count from the all-time high (ATH). Before you puke, note (v) = (i) with extreme alternation between ((ii)) and ((iv)). Wave (iii) is longer than (i); no overlap; no rules broken.
ES Futures - 4 Hr - Minute ((a)) wave down |
In the minute ((b)) wave, the start of the pattern was the leading diagonal (a) wave which was also called out in real time.
ES Futures - 4 Hr - Minute ((b)) wave up |
For the minute ((c)) wave of Minor 1, below, also note that wave (v) = (i).
ES Futures - 4 Hr - Minute ((c)) and Minor 1 Down |
I had no questions about the Minor 2 up wave. I don't think many of us did. Just the top of it is shown here on the upper left.
ES Future - 12 Hr - Minor 3 Down |
The alternation above is diagonal ((a)) - ((b)) - impulse ((c)). Minute ((c)) = 0.618 x minute ((a)). Minor 3 is longer in price & time than Minor 1. It is increasingly possible that Minor 4 will be longer in price and time than Minor 2. And, yes, within the descending contracting diagonal - also pointed out in the DJIA, wave (iv) is shorter in price than wave (ii). Shorter by ticks, but shorter.
It has been a bear of a count, so far, pun intended! Have a good start to your evening. Thanks to blog reader and excellent contributor BBRider for rekindling my interest in this count.
TraderJoe
I assume its ok for ((a)) of 3 to be longer than all of 1 because it looks to be an exp. diag (assuming overlap)?
ReplyDeleteThanks
Yes, I think so. TJ.
DeleteThanks. In the event ES reaches 3950 (not far away), this will create a horizontal target area of 4700-4800. Also, should price continue upward, there will likely be vertical measures to this same area (or higher). There's nothing that says this area will (or has to) be reached! But, it will be something to note, especially as it would exceed our current 2 peak. I've learned not to write these higher targets off out of hand. Just an observation.
ReplyDeleteXLY/XLP (w/d) - early sign of risk on? update - [if interested]
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/o5aar6iqmg77zcx/xlyxlpwd.PNG/file
A growth vs value decision from a decade ago - [if interested]
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/12i3cctqfdgswlx/GrowthvsValue.PNG/file
https://schrts.co/tKVIZNYQ
ReplyDeleteMost major corrections pullback to the 200 weekly MA. We also have the 50% retracement from ‘20 lows in the same area at 3505
I forgot to mention to check out MACD. Lower than ‘08 & ‘09. Interesting
DeleteSPY 30-min outside range candle 'vibration' at 1.382 level. Need a clear five waves down to start any serious issues lower.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/6c21n5RR/
TJ
In light of where the daily and intraday Bollinger Bands are, this count is offered as another way to get minute ((a)), all provided that (iii) remains less than (i). I'm just thinking about Ira's guidance to 'never' buy over a daily Bollinger Band, and to wait for a better location. (..just paraphrasing Ira, not providing trading or investment advice.)
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/limLyHXD/
TJ
SPX (25x3)(25x1) - Combining "time frames" if you will -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/j0ni4jhpbk00pc3/spx25x%25283_%25261%2529.PNG/file
Interesting! & good work. TJ.
DeleteJNK (dly) (risk on?) - facing a couple of tests
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/p1an24tv5a67nqd/JNKrotests.PNG/file
Thank you all! I learn so much on here every day. Hope to start contributing one day
ReplyDeleteHi ET,
ReplyDeleteWhen you state "It is increasingly possible that Minor 4 will be longer in price and time than Minor 2", do you mean the time frame to be absolute or relative to the previous wave (ie 2's retrace vs 1, and 4's retrace vs 3)? I believe Minor 2 took about 2/3 the time of Minor 1, which would suggest an early August (the 7th) resolution to Minor 4, this seem reasonable? Or are you thinking longer considering the inevitable "4th Wave Conundrum" might add complexity?
Thanks
Absolute. Wave 4 should just be longer than wave 2 in time (forget about the amount of time the waves spend retracing their down waves). Use the futures and just count bars. Wave 4 (if it is an expanding diagonal) 'should have' more bars than wave 2. Hope this helps.
DeleteTJ
TSLA (wkly) Waiting -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/l0yms5qxxvl89qc/TSLArhd.PNG/file
A new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTraderJoe