ES futures made a new lower low day on the daily chart. That keeps the daily swing-line headed lower. Price remains below the 18-day SMA, and so the bias remains down. Today, on a shorter-term time frame we got very close to confirming five-waves-down, as shown in the ES 30-min chart, below, which now has about 100 candles on it, close to the 120 - 160 recommended.
The current wave is traveling within a parallel channel to a large degree. Today, it looked like a ivth wave running triangle (shown) had formed that met all the usual Elliott Wave rules for a triangle, and also had the right ending point on the Elliott Wave Oscillator (circled). IFF that is the case, then a lower low can be expected but also so can a pretty significant turn-around on this time frame, after lower lows. There are a couple of conditions: 1) we are assuming the wave structure did not truncate at this afternoon's higher low, and 2) technically, as long as price does not overlap wave i, down, then we can still be in fourth wave, iv. Such a wave could be a more complex structure. This is The Fourth Wave Conundrum and it occurs at every degree of trend.
So, it might be worth watching the overnight to see if the 4,357 low is taken out or not or whether overlap develops. It looks like that wave ((1)), down and ((2)), up of five have formed. If so, a gap down in the over-night for ((3)) down, might later fill during the day on a turn-around Tuesday. There are no guarantees, of course. (None of this is intended as trading or investment advice - just a description of possible wave progress).
There is no way to reduce risk to nothing by wave counting, but the above chart, with 100 candles does suggest that if a fifth wave, v, lower forms it should do so on a divergence with the Elliott Wave Oscillator.
Happy Valentine's,
TraderJoe
Thanks,Joe!
ReplyDeleteThanks as well! Do we need to exceed the triangle ((B)) to validate?
ReplyDeleteWe should.
DeleteTJ
TJ,
ReplyDeleteI wanted you to look at my count on the chart attached. I thought that the waves counted better as a-b-c on the 1-2-3 waves down so far. And since wave 5 should be longer I was looking at wave 3 and it's first wave down looks similar to this wave that we're completing now. And it had a shallow Wave B based on my labeling and then the big sell-off. Or should these be counted in 5 waves?
https://www.tradingview.com/i/tIDEml8D/
Thanks,
No. Red A 'must' by rule be five waves. You have it as three waves, and this 'rushes' the count. You need to become more familiar with the 'rules' for diagonals. Wave 5 should decompose to a 'simple' zigzag. You have it as 'complex'.
DeleteTJ
Ok. I went and changed my count to 5 waves. Wave 1 was pretty easy to count. But wave 3 is a lot harder to count. Is it close? You don't need to spend a lot of time on it. I just have a hard time with it.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/i/35J6fIq5/
Ronb.. stop reinventing the wheel and go back and read the entire post on 10 Feb.
DeleteTJ
BTC - A few verticals and channel measures since data inception [if interested]
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/ob1ztxpp04pfc4k/BTCmeasures.PNG/file
Thank you for reply GW. Haven't studied PnF charts yet.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the update ET.
Hope everyone enjoys Valentine's day.
Thanks TJ,
ReplyDeleteJust to clarify we are iv of the larger 5th from top. The 5th should be larger than the 3rd both in time and price so shouldn't the target of v of 5th be below 4200?
Am I reading wrong?
Go back and read both charts from 10 Feb. We are only in v of ((a)) = circle-a.
DeleteTJ
Thanks Tj,
DeleteEs overlapped.
..see the next day's post.
DeleteTJ
https://www.mediafire.com/view/ntzhms0fbvsfgfu/Capture.PNG/file
ReplyDeleteI guess this is possible count - but not the nicest one.
No, sorry.
DeleteTJ
..see the next day's post.
DeleteTJ
GC - "Old School" PnF (fulcrums and catapults) [if interested]
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mediafire.com/view/stqhojngvwx7wai/GoldFulcrumCatapult-overlay.png/file