Almost a year ago, on June 6th, 2020, in a post called Trillions (available at this LINK), I said it was highly likely that because of the lengths of various wave structures, we were now in a Primary ((B)) wave higher. I said, it was likely that we could go over the high. We did. And, when questioned, I said it was very possible for this Primary ((B)) wave up to also consume more time than the prior Intermediate (B) wave up to the high in 2020. This is Primary week. This week we have wave equality in time with that prior upward Intermediate (B) wave. See the weekly ES chart, below.
ES Futures - 1 Wk - Wave Equality in Time |
As of this week, there is no clear sign of a top. Last week's low would need to be exceeded first. And there are still at least three good ways for this up trend to continue.
Why is recognition of Primary Week important? Unlike many professional and casual Elliott Analysts, and even several money managers, recognition of how long Primary ((B)) could last has prevented me from prematurely calling for the big crash. I was looking for corrections only, and they have been real stinkers at that! Yet, others have called at many turns for the crash! So, what are the three ways the trend could continue?
- We can be in the fifth wave, minute ((v)) of Minor C of Intermediate (Y), now. Such a wave could truncate near the high.
- We can still be in the minute ((iv)) wave - such as in a larger triangle - of Minor C of Intermediate (Y). Such a triangle could run for days, yet.
- We can have finished Intermediate (Y), higher, and can be starting another Intermediate (X) wave. But, for this last option, we need to take out last week's low, first.
In last week's decline, some of the sentiment indicators backed off from being a tad over-heated. This week, we are traveling somewhat sideways. Recently, the NYSE advance-decline line made a new high. So there are still indications they can push this wave farther in time. Few analysts pay attention to time and what it might mean in the wave count. We hope this documented demonstration shows some of the value of doing so.
We are still taking it slowly. We are being flexible and patient and counting waves until we see the set of circumstances that looks like it spells trouble. Stay tuned.
Have a good start to the evening.
TraderJoe
GREAT WORK TJ, Thank you so much!
ReplyDeleteWelcome, Terry.
DeleteAn aside - T (dly) A nice example of a gap (trap) 'n crap today. Ouch!
ReplyDeletehttps://funkyimg.com/i/3c51K.png
Dramatic!
DeleteThanks TJ.
ReplyDeleteFor those that viewed the Weinstein methodology post over the wkend (BTU), it was up a smooth 32%+ today. Nice!
ReplyDeleteWhile reviewing this methodology I keep having the corn monthly chart jump off my screen and slap me in the face.
ReplyDeleteSomething like this? :o)
Deletehttps://funkyimg.com/i/3c53P.png
Joe thanks. That's something you could have shared more often.
ReplyDeletehttps://schrts.co/TZBDtWME
ReplyDeleteNaaim is at a level it usually bounces.
An aside - CRS and Stan working together [if interested] -
ReplyDeletehttps://funkyimg.com/i/3c54Z.png
THX
DeleteTJ, Is it common to have an irregular primary ((A))) Oct2018-Mar2020 nested in a next higher degree irregular wave (i.e. followed by a higher ((B)) wave)?
ReplyDeleteIn support and development with novice comment:
ReplyDeleteTJ as always great, thank you very much.
In continuation of your logic about waves time equalities.
Wouldn't it be logical to assume the equality of the entire
Primary ((A)) and Primary ((B))?
Then your option 3) with Intermediates (XX) - (Z) is required
to fully equalize ((A)) and ((B)).
Then we have the end of Primary ((B)) on May 15th 2022.
Early look at the hrly -
ReplyDeletehttps://funkyimg.com/i/3c5aC.png
TJ: class is it clear ?
ReplyDeleteAll: yes sir! Crystal.
Thanks TJ for this post.
Good morning all. SPY 15-min: The count is still 'in no one's land'. Assume for a moment we are in a fourth wave triangle, (iv), before (v) of C of ((B)).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/jFzAOOKu/
Then, this morning's slight break of trend line makes some sense.
TJ
SPX (wkly) - McClellan says this time is different (so far)
ReplyDeletehttps://funkyimg.com/i/3c5eh.png
Not sure how likely this is but looks to be that cash and futures counts not the same.
ReplyDeleteSPX (dly) McC Osc view -
ReplyDeletehttps://funkyimg.com/i/3c5f7.png
A new interim post on the NQ 100 index has been started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ