Sunday, March 17, 2019

The SAME Three Waves Down

I have written about this before in the early days of the blog, and during the days when I was making YouTube videos. I am writing this post to re-emphasize the point and introduce some who may not have seen the earlier information. I specifically coined the term, "The Fourth Wave Conundrum" to recognize that when a down movement starts with only three-waves-down, then the number of Elliott wave possibilities explode (to thirteen or more).

During this time, people get "testy" with each other. You will recognize people who just "want to know when this up movement is over, and when the big down waves will begin". Everybody wants to "know what the count is." They don't care how to analyze the waves, they only know they are getting whipped around and their account may be getting trashed. So, they don't care about anything else except who is right, and who's count is going to make the agony end by price starting to trend again.

For that reason I show this schematic. It shows the very same three waves down in red, as they start only several of the possible patterns which can be part of a larger degree fourth wave. Assume the three red waves are from the October, 2018, all time high.


The Same Three Waves Start Multiple Elliott Wave Patterns

By now, if you have followed my work, you know that each of these patterns is possible from the start of three waves lower. So are the expanded flat, a truncated flat, an extended flat, a FLAT-X-Triangle, a FLAT-X-Zigzag, and, yes, even just a simple impulse up to new highs.

Your chances of determining the correct pattern by random chance are about 1 in 13, or less than an 8% chance. Those are not especially good odds. About the only thing I know that can 'help' in this problem is degree labeling and the break of upward sloping trend lines.

But, during this time, be especially kind to your Elliott analyst - especially if it is You! This is the true science of Elliott Wave as few others will take the time to describe to you. Do you have the patience for this? Does it help you in your trading or investing? Maybe so. Maybe not.

The market is just providing you with information. What you do with it and how you use it is totally up to you. Maybe the reason the current up wave is so hard to describe is that it's an "X" wave. They can be really tough. But so can a B:3 wave. And so can wave (ii) in a diagonal. And, clearly there are other possibilities.

This is what the Elliott Wave Principle means by (paraphrase) "sometimes the analyst just has to let the situation clear up".

As of this time, we have not broken the upward sloping trend line from the December 24th low through the March 8th low in the S&P500 cash index. Maybe we will soon. That would be an event to watch for. If it doesn't break, it will tell you "something" about the count.

Have a great rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe

P.S. As I said over the weekend, we have no right to assume upward movement has ended. We just have no "proof positive". We have not broken the lower channel line in the chart below. MotiveWave has no issue with the count shown, and the alternate is shown too.

S&P500 Cash Index - 4 HR - Needs Resolution

The longest correction in time may be the ((b)) wave. A second S&P500 15-minute chart was added below.

S&P500 Cash Index - 15-Minute - Potential Diagonal

Notice the declining AO within the wave. That's a good signature for a diagonal, but it would need to prove itself. Because we have not exceeded the time of (iii), yet, then (v) could go longer as a flat b wave and c wave up to follow, but does not need to.

41 comments:

  1. gold futures on the daily is that 123 up now abc because ewo took on more than allowed under efp?

    a = 10/26
    b = 11/13
    c = 2/20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just be aware that there are problems with 1) degree violations, 2) wave overlaps, and 3) incorrect lengths in diagonals the way you are counting. So it may count better as W-X-Y, with Y = 0.618 x W, and W = 01/04, and Y = 2/20, with the first 'a' wave on 8/28, and a first 'b' wave running triangle to 11/28. The whole structure may be a 'double-zigzag' in a larger weekly triangle structure. If so, it would be the D wave of that triangle, and are now in the E wave down.

      Delete
    2. good fib relation in the w in that c = 1.618 of a

      Delete
    3. Been watching this as well. Weekly should come back below the 34 ema and C was .786 the time of A. Putting up some time extensions on A and C and see what it looks like those weeks.

      Delete
    4. Joe, on the weekly for gold you are using 4/13/18 for b correct? i thought 78.6 was about it for a triangle we hit 90. i was wondering if you had anything to add as to that observation.

      Delete
    5. Barrier triangles can go to the old highs of 3 or A; that's much more than 76%.

      Delete
  2. 3 waves down can also be END of downward movement. if so, those who apply wave degrees should think hard about alternates. i know i have. i wont post the 2 obvious ones until ET does the same. the measurements tell quite a different story than the primary. i would say i have 60-70 % chance of having count same as ET at that point based on my track record.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ..first paragraph under the chart, "even just a simple impulse to new highs".

      Delete
  3. Joe you wrote above "these" three waves down can be part of a larger degree 4th wave. was that an example or is that the count?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paragraph two, 'Everybody wants to "know what the count is."'.

      Delete
    2. funny joe....
      i can count just fine. I was wondering why you chose to specificy a 4th wave thats all....

      Delete
  4. Thanks so much for this post Joe! This is really what makes Elliott wave analysis so hard and why people question it so much.

    ReplyDelete
  5. TJ, I don't know if you have addressed 2018 high as primary 3 and the Dec low as primary 4. I have seen others with that count and it looks plausible. What is your take?

    ReplyDelete
  6. A P.S. has been added to today's post and includes a MotiveWave chart on cash showing an acceptable count and alternate (in blue).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MotiveWave enforces all of the EW rules regarding the lengths of the waves and overlaps, so the count is a plausible one.

      Delete
  7. Was thinking plausible ED as C wave at todays high with A = 2795 and B = 2787 but that would not be allowed because 2 of the ED would be larger in price?

    ReplyDelete
  8. 4 of contracting ed on 30 min ES?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have added a second chart in the P.S. with a potential diagonal. (Notice I did not say 'ending', yet).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I always have trouble counting when C does not exceed A like in your (ii)

      Delete
  10. Up wave since the 11:30 am low has enough 'time and distance' to be of 'the same degree' as the down wave. More 38% of the price and >200% of the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .. just an item to stick in your back pocket, if it comes to it .. the current 50% retrace is enough to allow an extended third wave if the lows are broken. (But nothing yet says up wave is over).

      Delete
  11. Price now at the .618 extension of A - if A was at 2675

    ReplyDelete
  12. ET, So no issues if we have an expanded flat here? Would we need to revise our count of expanded flat at wave 1 and 2 back in 2010 - 2011?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yes, there are issues. I mentioned it for 'completeness' only.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the response!
      Following on limited basis due to your excellent post above! Weekly does appear to be correct time frame so we need more time. The correction in 2016 was 37 weeks. What ever we call the correction in 2010-2011 was 75 weeks.

      Delete
  13. Joe,
    The entirety of your 3 posts on top of the blog today are exceptional.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Clear five-waves up on the S&P500 5-min cash; can go higher if it wishes or truncate.

    ReplyDelete
  15. this is as good as it gets to complete pattern off lows. Doesn't mean it cant go much much higher.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Replies
    1. Same as saying "in the long run we'll all be dead" ;)

      Delete
  17. .. fwiw .. today is Fibonacci day 55 off of the Dec low.

    ReplyDelete
  18. IBD leaders are not as strong and impulsive as they were a month ago. A lot of consolidation going on.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Diagonal can still be a wedge shaped impulse 5<3<1?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  20. A new post has been started for the next day.

    ReplyDelete