Friday, May 28, 2021

Windows Dressed

In the comments today, we reminded readers that - today being the last day of the month - could see some sloppiness, as portfolio managers juggled their positions around for the new month. It was a fairly sloppy day, drifting after an initial pop higher. Similarly, Tuesday is the first trading day of the new month for cash equities, and the typical inflows from usual sources is 'often' seen. Further, we showed this plausible up count on the ES 2-Hr chart. And here is what was written ...

ES Futures - 2 Hr - Up Wave in a Wedge

Looking at the up wave from 4,029: there are 138 candles on the chart. The wave is diverging all the way up on the Elliott Wave Oscillator. The wave is in a wedge. And, very importantly, the wave has reached the 90% level.

This doesn't necessarily mean the wave is over. But, also very importantly, in order to adhere to degree labeling, the first subwave of y 'has to be' shorter than all of w, which it is in this format (and only in this format I think). Further, there is one level of overlap to contend with.

So, this can still be the (b) wave of a barrier triangle or a flat (or expanded flat over the high).

Next, I added that given the size of the initial 'x' wave, I would not be opposed to an 'x' wave which was longer in downward price. In other words, the light blue dashed line is the current lower wedge line. It is shown as dashed because it might be necessary to modify it slightly for a longer wave 'x'. So, that modified line is shown as dashed purple.

In addition we said there is a way to count a smaller degree potential triangle on the ES 30-min chart. But, it is only a potential and could easily devolve into a larger flat wave in the overnight session(s). And, by the end of the session, there was an additional level of overlap to contend with. Still it looks like this up wave should be wrapped up within a couple of days.

Let's see how it goes, and have a nice weekend & holiday if you are celebrating it.

TraderJoe


18 comments:

  1. Thanks for your work Joe. Happy Memorial Day everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks as always, have a nice holiday ☺️

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sectors (Mthly) -

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3c9KN.png

    ReplyDelete
  4. Copper/Gold ratio (wkly) -

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3c9Lo.png

    ReplyDelete
  5. Discretionary vs Staples - two views, and an alert - [if interested]

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3c9NW.png

    ReplyDelete
  6. Not a new idea (nor mine), but rather just food for thought. [if interested] -

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3c9ZH.png

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Ralph Acompora did something similar but used the December low.

      Delete
  7. QQQs (daily) - ADL & OBV -

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3ca2z.png

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why do you that divergence will now resovle. Is there a rule of thumb that certain point it resolves. Thanks

      Delete
    2. I think the Q’s are most vulnerable to a correction especially if we get higher rates this summer. I still think we visit 300 again before October.

      Delete
    3. https://schrts.co/ShavQGFC

      NUSI

      Delete
  8. https://schrts.co/GZWtuIes

    I like the BB set at 50 dma, it gives you different targets. Look at how many times it came back to 50 in last year. The upper BB lines up with upper TL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, this is called plain-ole 'curve-fitting' or back-fitting the curve to the data, so that this segment of data looks 'pleasing' to your eye. The fact is that Bollinger Bands of 'any' period greater than 15 will always 'work'. That is because of the "2 standard-deviations" in the formula. Why greater than 15? Because a basic statistics text will show it takes more than 15 observations to develop a good estimate of std-dev.

      All that is happening here is a "trade-off" of sensitivity or responsiveness in favor of additional bars inside the bands, and a change in the definition of the daily 'bias' from the 18-period to the 50-period. You can do that. Everyone can do that. Ira does that when he plots the weekly BB instead of the daily on the weekend videos.

      You can also go back and change the date to the date range from the one you selected to the period 2018-01-01 to 2020-03-30 and see if you like the results as much (since the market was whippier there, where do you trust the signals, if any?).

      The fact is you can do 'anything' to the data in the 'past'. You can do 'anything' with the prices in the past - develop any indicator you like, not just Bollinger Bands, but oscillators, etc. That is precisely why I have a rule that I can only count the Elliott wave 'forward in time'. The past is what it is. It can not change.

      TJ

      Delete
    2. Point taken. I never suggested trading using BB alone. Any trader relying on one indicator including Elliott Wave is not going to do well. I looked at the dates you suggested and 18 period was just as whippy as 50 period. I’ll leave it at that.

      Delete
  9. BTC (dly,log) - Chomping at the "bit"coin? :o)

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3caeR.png

    ReplyDelete
  10. An aside - KNDI (dly) EVs making a stand? [if interested] -

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3cahM.png

    ReplyDelete
  11. A further aside - PFPT (mthly) One textbook, and possibly another [if interested] -

    https://funkyimg.com/i/3caju.png

    ReplyDelete