Thursday, September 21, 2023

"Nothing Bullish on the Current Chart"

Over the last several days, we have been writing about how the ES futures had a downside bias because prices were closing below the 18-day SMA. The same occurred today. The daily bias remains lower. But then, too, today, prices closed in the lower quartile of their daily bar for the second day in a row. Ira often defines this as a downside breakout. Further, prices are pushing the lower daily Bollinger Band downward and outward. As we discussed yesterday and, in the comments, price has also broken both of the prior daily down (red) fractals, lower. In short, there are lower lows and lower highs.


This is all to say, "there is nothing bullish on the current chart". So, now, in recognition of the break of the prior lows, we can assign labels to the 18 Aug low and the 01 Sep high. But, because price has not broken the upward channel yet (see chart at this LINK), then we must maintain our objectivity and assign completely equivalent labels. This is just in recognition that a fourth wave could form at the lower channel boundary as a a-b-c wave down. These labels are to be read identically. That is, "It is the same as "a", as it is as "i" at the low, and it is the same as "b" as it is as "ii" at the high.

As price begins to move through equality below the 4,310 level, then we may gain a preference for one over the other. But not just yet. And one shouldn't care. If price moves lower, it moves lower. It could move through equality to 1.618 or 2.168. The count will become more apparent.

Right now, our job is just to try to utilize the downtrend, given the inevitable bounces.

Have a good start to the evening.

TraderJoe

7 comments:

  1. Hello TJ, and thank you for all your great analysis and instruction. Now that you've just said there's nothing bullish on the current chart...

    In looking at the NASDAQ from the 12/28/2022 low, looking at a daily chart, can we count an impulsive upward wave of i (Feb 2), ii (Mar 10), iii (Jul 19), and currently in iv? Of that iv, a (Aug 18) was ~1,070 points, b was on Sep 1, and c in progress. a=c would be ~13,000.

    It appears iv would have good alternation and appropriate scale vs. ii. What else would invalidate iv, other than crossing below i at ~12,200? It does appear that the current wave down would have already fallen out of the upward channel since 12/28/2022.

    Thanks in advance for your thoughts!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you read The Eight Fold Path Method which is the featured post on the upper right of the main blog page? Other criteria that can warn of a fourth wave about to bust would be > 50% retrace on the 3rd wave, and/or an Elliott Wave Oscillator >40% in the opposite direction of wave three (EWO or AO).
      TJ

      Delete
  2. 9/15 volume was higher than today. I see 2 possible scenarios. 1. SPY fills today's gap which I'd assume more sideways price movement. 2. Head and Shoulder's break and price doesn't move above today's high. This idea could look like ET's chart.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bounced at that horizontal support but not to perky yet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. what is there to do when the slope of a wave is so steep that a parallel channel cannot be drawn? assume it's just an extended wave and keep waiting for wave 2/b to draw the channel?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. See the next day's post (for overall perspective). For the latest channel use a smaller time-frame. (30-min, 15-min, etc.). TJ.

      Delete
  5. A new post is started for the next day.
    TJ

    ReplyDelete