Based on the long-term chart of Gold using six-monthly bars we can not specifically say whether we are in a triangular fourth wave, or possibly an ending-diagonal fifth wave. That is the phenomenon often referred to and often written about here as The Fourth Wave Conundrum that happens at every degree of trend. However, based on channel analysis it is possible to sketch out a reasonable scenario for the triangle as we showed in our comments in this post (Mar 14th: LINK see comment at 9:32 am).
The basic reasoning is that when a third wave, III, extends then prices tend to form a channel. If so, based on the amount of 'time' wave II consumed, then wave IV might look to take as much or more time. So, a triangle might fit the bill. Further, an expanded flat correction would likely have the risk of overlapping wave Cycle I.
And, if that is the case, then based on degree labeling. what was known at the time and waves I counted, this monthly count seems to work quite well.
Notice, there is another smaller upward channel. This suggests that all waves in the channel belong to the same set of wave structures. Thus, the waves can be counted as a triple zigzag upward with a (Z) wave truncation at the high. As I have repeatedly suggested (Z) waves are prone to truncation, and this one may have.
Yet, we do not know that upward movement is over without a lower monthly low on the chart. So, we must also recognize it is dangerous in Elliott Wave to count a triple zigzag upward without also recognizing that it might be the impulse equivalent of an (A) wave. Therefore, it is roughly equally likely at this point that a (C) wave up could make for a higher Primary Ⓑ wave as is shown in the red alternate. It could be that upward price movement will stop in this area with a channel back-test, but there simply is no guarantee.
IF the first scenario is correct, then a lower monthly low on Gold might indicate the Primary Ⓒ wave is underway. If not, then Primary Ⓑ waves of this type can certainly extend higher to 1.382 or 1.618 times their Primary Ⓐ waves. So, the reasonable analyst should not be surprised by movement of this type.
Have an excellent rest of the day.
TraderJoe
Gold miners (GDX) daily chart - https://www.tradingview.com/x/qqEf4aR4/
ReplyDeleteThx so much TJ!
ReplyDeleteI was thinking (B) was the all time high and (C) is starting off with an expanding diagonal but they never seem to pan out, but its there.
ReplyDeletehttps://imgur.com/00d7vdi
Watching this on the ES.
Deletehttps://imgur.com/c7yaGA2
On Gold, Neely would tend to disagree with the diagonal count because 1) the trend line of the channel wasn't broken when the diagonal 'started', 2) the 'speed' of a diagonal is slower than a first impulse off of the high. I'm not saying I agree with everything Neely suggests, I do find these two ideas somewhat compelling, tho. TJ.
DeleteI don't give it high odds, seems to be quite the illusive animal.
DeleteFrom CBNC if you haven't seen it already.
ReplyDeleteUBS Offer to Buy Credit Suisse
TJ
Follow-up story on UBS buying Credit-Suisse from Bloomberg.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-19/credit-suisse-s-17-billion-of-risky-bonds-are-now-worthless?srnd=markets-vp
TJ
Hi TJ!
ReplyDeleteI would very much appreciate your long-term insights. Basically, a follow up on the year end review from 2022 that I linked below. Any chance you could share your count for the entire history of the S&P500? I'm curious where your super-cycles match/deviate from mine because our cycles and primaries match up very nicely.
Thank you in advance! And thank you for all the details you share on this blog!
https://studyofcycles.blogspot.com/2022/01/year-end-review-of-s.html?lr=1
Triangle did not work, WXY?
ReplyDeletehttps://imgur.com/q8GwDlK
I think this is what is going on. Have a good night.
Deletehttps://imgur.com/09zlsTI
XX was a near perfect a=c. Now we have to be on failure watch.
Deletehttps://imgur.com/fIEjCRR
A new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ