Market Indexes: Major U.S. Equity Indexes closed lower; DJUtil higher
SPX Candle: Lower High, Lower Low, Lower Close - Trend Candle
FED Posture: Quantitative Tightening (QT)
Yesterday we said to be on the watch out for a truncation because the margin was razor thin (only about -2 points) between a trend change and a sub-dividing wave c of minuet v of minute (iii). In the overnight futures markets, it quickly became apparent that margin of error was not going to hold. So, it is likely the minute (iii) wave topped last night, and as we showed before, the minute (iii) wave is a 161.8% extension on wave minute (i) to within points. Here is the daily chart again, with that key measurement.
S&P500 Cash Index - Daily - Gap Lower |
It was only wave minuet v, of minute (iii) that had a slight truncation, and only by a point - completely acceptable given that the Dow did make a new all-time high, yesterday. Today's gap lower will likely continue the process of the Elliott Wave Oscillator moving lower toward the zero line for minute wave (iv).
Now, it would be common for minute wave (iv) to get down into the vicinity of minuet iv. Minute (iv) has already contacted and broken the EMA-34 indicating that as a minute (iv)th wave it would have good form and balance. But, it could have farther to travel lower. How it gets there is anyone's guess, and this is part of The Fourth Wave Conundrum, yes, which happens at every degree of trend. What we can say is that since the x wave of minute (ii) "went over the top", then the b wave or x wave of minute (iv) should not go over the top in order to show good alternation. So far, so good.
From the standpoint of an internal count from the high, so far there are only three waves down. By making a lower low tomorrow, the market could impulse. By making a higher high than today's bar, before a lower low, maybe a double zigzag lower becomes a possibility or a larger triangle. The Payroll Employment report is tomorrow, and the market's immediate and longer term reactions will be telling.
We have also cited before that the risk of making an incorrect count decision here is growing rapidly. So, last night's high has also been listed as the alternate wave minute (v), and the end of the entire bull market in a slight truncation.
One thing is for certain: the market left a gap today (see the last red circle). Inquiring minds have to ask why. Why not a key reversal at the all-time high, for example: is that coming up in our future? But that is just one of the reasons why the red count is currently the alternate count, and not the main count.
Have a very good start to your evening.
TraderJoe
ReplyDeleteHi Joe ... relaying a question from pedro deleon who requested assistance posting this ... If you applied your eight fold to the monthly spx from 2009, do you also get the third of a third wave peak in Jan 2018 based on the peaking EWO? And if so, does this suggest The Top that may be imminent, would be the fifth of the Third. And that the Fourth Wave Conundrum will continue, just at higher degree? Or did I miss the boat somewhere?
In my modest opinion, over long term charts like monthly, EWO most of the time show the peak in the last wave, because EWO draw a difference of absolute values of two averages and if the analized index or equity has gone up a lot, the higher values are always the last.
DeleteI tested to modify EWO formula to correct this problem, but then it shows many divergences very soon that can create confusion.
I would not use "eight fold " further of weekly charts.
And finally, after the price action of yesterday, some professionals have adapted your wave count. Congratulations, once again.
ReplyDeleteAs of 11:45 am ET, on 10/5, each of the DJIA, S&P500, and NQ futures had all made lower lows as required of an impulse downward.
ReplyDeletedo u have a target for the first impulse wave down?
ReplyDeleteHe usually won't reply to Uknowns.
DeleteJoe,
Have the odds of the bull market being over increased significantly over last two days? Like you said, the last 9 1/2 hours look pretty impulsive on the downside. I know we shouldn't read too much into such a short time period but everything ends eventually.
Thanks,
Andrew
Increased? Yes. Significantly, Yes. Conclusive? Not by any means. Could still be a minute (iv) triangle or some other horrific structure.
DeleteHi Joe,
ReplyDeleteIs (v) of iii truncated ?
Is ending diagonal only possibility when that could happen OR
can truncation happen with regular impulse way also.
Thanks.