With Friday's large move higher, it appears the latter of these options is the correct one. Here is a revised daily chart of the U.S. Dollar Index. Friday's move does look like the typical 'thrust' out of a triangle, still on a divergence with the Elliott Wave Oscillator. The 'fooler' wave, of course, is the (d) wave of the barrier triangle - with it's marginal higher high - which initially suggested the upper barrier line could be the up-sloping line of a diagonal instead.
U.S. Dollar Index Futures - Daily - Likely Triangle |
With the inclusion of the channel, and the measurement boxes, one can see that the best count at this time is as a standard impulse wave - with 124 candles for the wave of interest - well within the usual parameters of The Eight Fold Path Methodology. And the boxes show this impulse has the potential to form a 5 = 1 leg, a very common relationship in Elliott Wave work. The important lesson here is not the exact count. No, the significance is that the Dollar demonstrates clearly how The Fourth Wave Conundrum operates to create uncertainty in the Elliott Wave - an uncertainty that must be dealt with and incorporated into one's routine. And, it happens at every degree of trend.
With Friday's drop, the S&P500 Index can be in one of several configurations including a fourth wave flat, a fourth wave triangle, a fifth wave diagonal or even a fifth wave truncation. Because some of these options are at different degrees of trend, rather than confuse the reader with too many options, we will be patient and calm and look for the wave sequence to clear up a bit. However, we will show the futures contract that has the greater propensity to be in a triangle now, at that is the Russell 2000 futures, below.
Russell 2000 Futures - Daily - Potential Triangle |
Again, like diagonals, triangles are structures which must prove themselves by forming properly, and by showing the correct post-pattern behavior. We will watch to see if this one does. As with all potential triangles, any significant drop below the prior (c) wave would be a sign that a triangle is not forming properly and require re-evaluation.
In the meanwhile, have an excellent weekend.
TraderJoe
That could end up ugly for the USD$ if we complete at 98 or just at a 61.8% retrace.
ReplyDeleteThank you ET
Welcome, Bill.
DeleteBill/Joe -
DeleteSince the wave illustrated above is an impulse starting early 2017, and given that the wave down from 2016 is also an impulse, would you expect that this is just an 'a' of an a-b-c corrective wave? In other words, if the top is struck, we should expect a 'b' corrective followed by another impulse potentially taking it higher than what DXY just struck out at for a final retrace 'ii'.
Thoughts?
Thanks Joe. Where is it written that wave (d) of a 4th wave triangle can exceed wave (b)? I've never heard of that before.
ReplyDeleteDepends how you read the word "essentially" on page 91 of The Elliott Wave Principle, where the rules for barrier triangles say that "except that waves (d) and (b) end at 'essentially' the same level.". Notice, they did not say at 'exactly' the same level.
DeleteAlso, see the comment to 6Q below. I chose the barrier form as it is the more proportional structure. But, either works.
Because of this 'gray area' several Elliott analysts use the additional guideline: for consideration of a barrier triangle, then wave (d) may not 'close' above wave (b) on the time frame of the triangle. (No higher daily close if on a daily chart; no higher hourly close if on an hourly chart). It is the one slippery slope within Elliott Wave, but it does perfectly explain why so many potential ending diagonals do not go on to develop the reversal in prices immediately expected after a diagonal. It's because they are not diagonals, but triangles, and the post pattern behavior is the 'thrust'.
DeleteIn this case, I read the word "essentially" as "less than or equal to," and I use all prices, not just closing prices. So, I would count the formation in question as a running complex flat, which ended either where you have your wave (e) positioned, or 3 bars to the right, at the slightly higher low. (which would make wave 4 an abcxabcde.)
DeleteGreat analysis Joe. thanks for the great content
ReplyDeleteWelcome Roger.
Deleteso in ew world the d wave could be higher than b.... is that correct. trader joe
ReplyDeleteHi. Jack. See replies above & below.
Deleteon dollar, from (a) to (d) could be all a long and complex (b) and a very small (e) just before de break out.
ReplyDeleteYes. I have considered that as well. Either way, it's still a triangle.
Delete