Friday, September 13, 2019

Mama's Got a Squeeze Box

U.S. Debt Clock: $22.56 Trillion
ES Daily Candle: Higher High, Higher Low, Lower Close: Yin-Yang Candle
Market Posture: Neutral and Probing Waves
Daily Swing Line: Up (Higher Low, Higher High)
Daily Bias: Up (Settle Over 18-day SMA)

The ES futures were slightly higher over-night, but did not make a new all-time high, and sold off before the open of trading, closing with a lower close. The daily slow stochastic is still embedded. In the cash market for the S&P and the Dow, the higher high was not (yet) seen. Imagine that: another invisible wave in cash. Here is the short term picture of the DOW cash on the 30-minute time-frame.

DJIA - 30 Minute - Triangle?

Clearly, the market was squeezed within a range today on the light volume. Therefore, we might expect a higher high on Monday. The Elliott Wave Oscillator is also nearing the zero line and may be indicating another fourth wave. The triangle may not be fully formed yet. There is room for some wiggle, but it is not required. Is it possible futures are making a diagonal while the cash makes only a triangle and a fifth wave? Plausible.

Below is chart showing the ES volume below price. This is what I mean by light volume. Compare today's volume bars to the previous two days.

ES Futures - 15 Minutes - With Volume

Light volume is often a sign of a triangle or diagonal until they breakout to the upside on a bevy of higher volume. Yes, there is a way to see the market as having topped today, however, there is both insufficient downside price, and insufficient downside speed to draw that conclusion. Further, a contracting diagonal in the futures was counted out live in yesterday's comment section, so it 'may' be an ending wave downward, and prior lows were not broken (see yesterday's comments if you have interest). Time will tell.

So, for now, keep in mind the FED meets next week, and have an excellent start to your evening and to your weekend.

TraderJoe

17 comments:

  1. What's the bigger picture count?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Still in Intermediate (B) until 1.382 x Intermediate (A) as covered in numerous posts and videos.

      Delete
    2. Thanks,
      What terminal do you have for W of (B)?

      Delete
    3. So you don’t mind the degree violation you told me was a problem a month ago when I tried to show a bullish alternate? That W is bigger than (A) and X bigger than (A) in time?

      Delete
    4. I said that maybe degree in corrections work the same as in impulses, that because (W) subdivides and likely is the extended wave in
      (B) it’s allowed to be bigger than (A), but you said ”No, it’s all of (A) versus W, keep it simple”.
      I agree I would love to keep it simple, but if we are not sure how degree works in complex corrections maybe one shouldn’t do to ”strong” statements about it...

      Delete
    5. @Erik. I'm really not trying to be argumentative, but I believe you only asked me about W. As far as I can tell, a scheme like this keeps the "net" distance traveled for the X1 and X2 waves the same.

      https://invst.ly/c9ige

      Think of it more like the "net distance traveled in a flat" and how that helps equalize the degrees between waves two and four in an impulse. Yes, you may say, "well that's cheating". And I would reply, "well, X2 ends with 'five-down'. Is that where the correction really ends?"

      TJ

      Delete
    6. Hi, sorry don't understand what you mean in second paragraph.
      It's easy for you to miss but I mentioned X degree problem many times also, but I had the terminal for W at the wrong place, see charts. I believe your chart from comments yesterday have a VERY high possibility to be correct, there are just too many waves and (A) down is too fast, therefore we need a very complex correction to avoid degree problems..down legs have to be same degree X!
      I’ll say it again I believe the Trump tweet after fed 31/8 caused another X, and that the Oct trade meeting news was the terminal for that X, likely as a triangle:

      https://invst.ly/ca3e8

      https://tvc-invdn-com.akamaized.net/data/tvc_c6c5cd44861c5b0c52a91ffceb402736.png

      https://invst.ly/bkoqz

      Delete
    7. It looked to me from your charts we are in 'violent agreement'?

      Delete
  2. Just an observation:
    7=3. Daily ES. From Aug 26 low, we have 7 "waves" (let's say a double zz). The zzs are virtually identical (equality). Apparent shooting star on Friday. Coincidence? Perhaps.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is it a diagonal on NQ100 futures?!
    https://invst.ly/ca69a

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is were I am at on Gold.

    https://imgur.com/gPo7VXg

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, the drone strike made Friday's diagonal down in the futures a "leading" one, not an ending one. But, still, I only have c = 1.272 x a, as shown.

    https://www.tradingview.com/x/jxvNkRy1/

    TJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With the last candle close at 1:00 PM ET, now ok to put another red (down) fractal under the 11:30 am larger red candle.

      Delete
  6. Maybe a finished impulse on cash 1>3>5 With flat 4 reached 90% for alternation

    ReplyDelete
  7. AS of the bottom of the hour, here is the situation: neither of the larger fractals has been exceeded, higher or lower, yet.

    https://invst.ly/caqn9

    TJ

    ReplyDelete