On the daily chart not too much has changed with the recent hostilities. In terms of the wave count it remains the same, as below. Confidence has increased slightly because, over the last couple of days, a longer wave down has been made than the (e) wave of the triangle, and it traded below that level, as well. Since, triangles often precede the last move in a sequence, there is some greater level of confidence that a top is in place temporarily on the ES daily chart, below.
![]() |
ES Futures - Daily - Minor A |
This also means that the break of the wave ((ii))-to-((iv)) trend line (circle-ii to circle-iv) occurred in less time than wave ((v)), circle-v, took to build. Neely adherents will recognize this as the first step in the confirmation process. Trading below the (a) wave, and possibly filling the higher of the two open gaps would be a good second step.
We say - and we mean - confidence precisely because we are always just dealing with probabilities and odds. For example - at present - we only can legitimately count three-waves-down, so far, on the hourly chart shown below.
![]() |
ES Futures - Hourly - Three Waves Down |
Notice the very precise Fibonacci relationships where - at the b wave high - wave Ⓒ = 2.618 x Ⓐ, and at the bottom wave c = 1.618 x a. Again, this just reinforces three-waves-down in the futures. Then, for the up wave, notice that it is longer in price than the b wave, up. Therefore, it is either of the same degree or one higher degree. At present, we are showing it as one higher degree. However, IF it is of the same degree, then it is possible a triangle is forming (we'll deal with than one if Friday's low is not exceeded lower).
Then, notice the Elliott Wave Oscillator (EWO or AO) is really only showing a significant trough, a hump above the zero line, and another lower significant trough. So, this looks like only a three-down, with a flat for the b wave.
This does not mean it can't start a diagonal lower, but lower lows are needed to prove that case. And if a diagonal forms, then the five minuette waves down, (i) through (v), would form minute ⓐ wave down, because it would take three minute waves, ⓐ-ⓑ-ⓒ to form the minimum Minor B wave down.
The bottom line is more length in the Minor B wave is probably still necessary. Readers of this blog should also plot the daily Bollinger Bands with the 18-day SMA and daily slow stochastic to see that all we have been doing is "fighting the battle at the 'line-in-the-sand'." A close below that 18-day SMA is needed to be a more convincing onset to the correction. So, try not to rush the counts. There are only three-waves-down, so far. The bulls are technically still in control until they are not. Legitimately, the three-waves-down means travel over the top is still possible until / unless Friday's low is exceeded lower.
Have an excellent rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe
What do you make of this pop? I'm not well versed on how futures operate on roll-over, but it seems that baked in premium caused large dip buying. Pre-market seems to be catching up somewhat, but I watched 20 Globaltankers leave the USA last night heading across the Atlantic. There's a real chance that we have to enter the war more directly (civilian centers getting hit with ballistic missiles) and Risk-On in that environment does boggle my mind.
ReplyDeleteI intentionally try not 'make' anything out of pops or waves. I just try to measure them as best as possible - which itself is not always easy. It's a discipline. I try to stick to it. This is all I see, so far in the ES roll-over contract. Wish I could see more but I don't.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/qwjnOg8S/
TJ
the roll over premium reflects interest rates and dividends. higher interest rates = higher premium on the roll. As time passes the embedded premium on the front contract apporaches 0, sowhen we roll to new month we have larger premium.
ReplyDeleteNot quite true. In March 2020, interest rates were 0.25%. The roll-over from the Thursday close to the Monday open of the new contract was nearly 100 pts!
Delete(from a close of 5,631 to a 'low' open of 5,739). There is something else operating, and I think it has more to do with Corporate buy-backs. TJ.
I think it is working this way: Goldman reports a record 2024 level of Corporate buy-backs as follows:
Delete"Corporate buybacks, also known as share repurchases, are currently at a high level, with some projections indicating a record-breaking year. In 2024, buybacks by S&P 500 companies reached $942.5 billion, a new annual record, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices. Furthermore, Goldman Sachs predicts that total buybacks could surpass $1 trillion in 2025. " As a result of the buybacks, there are literally fewer shares available to buy. See chart, below.
https://yardeni.com/charts/sp-500-shares-outstanding-sectors/
So, to some extent, besides dividends - as you rightly point out - If one wants to own a claim on, or futures on, an asset which is declining in availability, it sounds to me like they are making people "pay up for the privilege (ahem)".
To my way of thinking this is another significant indication of the wild concentration in and speculation in these markets. JMHO.
TJ
Very few of those share repurchases are made with cash on the books. They are issuing corporate bonds to finance re-purchases. What could possibly go wrong? 😊
DeleteYou mean like a carry-trade inversion? 🙃
DeleteTJ
A new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ