It has been stated several times in this blog that I am counting GOLD in parallels until that is no longer possible. This brings up two views on the question of the count. The first view is that price movement since the 2011 Cycle Wave III top is a very compressed triangle as Cycle Wave IV. That view is shown below on the log scale 3-monthly chart, below. It has been presented before. The measuring objective for this triangle "the widest width of the triangle added to the breakout point" has been met and exceeded, as shown. It is astonishing that GOLD has been up in nearly every quarter since October 2023 (still recognizing this quarter is only just started).
![]() |
| GOLD (GC Futures) - 3 Month - Log Scale Triangle Target |
So, it is entirely plausible we had a top in the vicinity of the target. But is it the top? Well, two nagging problems abound. The first is that the internal ratios of this barrier triangle just seem "too compressed". While it is a 'legal' triangle under the rules, usually, not always, triangles have 62 - 78% legs. This triangle does not. One is free to ask, "why not?". The next problem is the "indicator problem". Most of the indicators - whether Elliott Wave Oscillator, MACD, or RSI, etc. - are still screaming "third wave!" if we can believe them. So, what then?
If we look at a slightly shorter-term chart, the one-monthly view, we can see a possible answer to this conundrum.
![]() |
| GOLD (GC Futures) - Monthly Log Scale - Running Cycle IV |
In order to find that next parallel, what IF Cycle Wave IV actually ended back in Jul-Aug 2018 as a "running fourth wave", instead of as a triangle? On a log chart that produces the potentially acceptable channel shown above and provides for reasonably sized Primary waves. Notice, the indicator problem in this chart: both indicators are at highs in 89 candles. Bear in mind Mr. Elliott would applaud you for using a parallel on a long-term log chart.
So, what does this mean? Given such a stellar advance, what if GOLD largely traded sideways or made a large properly shaped triangle for its Primary ④th wave? Notice the lower rising parallel trend line and EMA-34 are both now high enough to prevent overlap - especially if there is more sideways wave travel. If this count is not adopted, notice the otherwise difficult problem of trying to find the Primary waves within Cycle Wave V.
Could GOLD go over the high again in this scenario? It certainly could: the Intermediate (B) wave of a Flat, an expanded flat, or a "running triangle" for Primary ④ could certainly go over the high. From a trading perspective, "range traders" might find it ideal (not trading or investment advice), but so might the algos that revel in creating havoc in the volatility. So, the utmost caution and low position sizing would seem prudent for retail traders. And, lastly, the Weekly Chart below helps provide more information.
![]() |
| GOLD (GC Futures) - Weekly - Spinning Top Candle |
Note that price is still over the 18-week SMA, so the bias is up, and the weekly slow stochastic is still embedded. Yes, there is a red "spinning top" candle here which is not confirmed on a weekly basis, and confirmation is always needed of a single candle pattern. But note also, price has not been back to the 18-week SMA since the beginning of 2025. And price has not been back to the lower weekly Bollinger Band since October 2023 (not shown but interested readers should look it up).
Further, notice how broker Ira Epstein's advice of "not buying new" over an upper Bollinger Band was quite savvy in this instance. Now he is largely talking about trend trading, but if one bought new positions at the high outside the Bollinger Band two weeks ago, then the close this week is lower. Yes, he might say (imitatingly), "sure you would have ridden the rocket perfectly, and gotten out at the top... um, not likely. I wouldn't have, only you would have." This is distinctly different advice than I heard Peter Schiff (Gold Dealer) give hours before the high on YouTube (paraphrase). "Buyers must buy the all-time-high. Because if they don't, then the all-time-high is only going to get higher." And that was right before the $926 excursion from high-to-low in the last two days of this week. Let's hear it for sentiment.
Please be careful out there. Be patient & flexible. If you don't know what a wave count is at the moment, that is a good time to 1) stop, 2) take measurements, and 3) use the Principle of Equivalence to determine what wave patterns best fit those measurements. I've done what I can do. Now, it's up to you.
Have an excellent rest of the weekend.
TraderJoe



ES 30-min: here is the 'first-of-the-month' passive money. TJ.
ReplyDeleteThe futures made new low and cash didnt..strange count between the 2
DeleteThanks Tj.
ReplyDelete"TACO" is on even after this
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/02/asia-pacific-markets-hang-seng-index-csi-300-gold-silver.html
Thanks for this update, TJ.
ReplyDeleteWelcome. TJ.
DeleteES 30-min: from the intraday wave-counting-screen. The intraday slow stochastic has been embedded since before the cash open.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/JNfdr9Z2/
So far, the R1 pivot has provided support. Possible to get an 18-per/200-per bull cross. Note, there were no up (green) fractals until the high. That is very unusual.
TJ
ES 30-min: from the intraday wave-counting-screen. Currently there are four closes below the lower band, dropping the odds of the next close below the band to 2-4% (not impossible, just lower odds).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/u5baz1Nn/
The slow stochastic could go embedded on this bar; need to watch.
TJ
...embedded; one of the stronger signals in technical analysis; not much bullish until/unless back over the intraday 18-per SMA. TJ.
DeleteSPY Cash (1-hr) - just dropped below the prior day open (PDO). This makes life difficult - 'maybe' a triangle forming? Very hard to tell.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/e6zEgzSN/
TJ
ES 30-min: now seven closes below the lower band; odds 0 - 2% of next close below the band. Again, not impossible, just lower odds. Also, lower than a 62% retrace which 'can be' in triangle territory.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/ynKPttty/
TJ
now down to S1; no let-up seen yet. Also, eight (8) closes below the band.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/lh25x7ex/
TJ
SPY (cash) 1-hr: SPY had gotten up to 90%; so this could be a FLAT, or a 'failure' in SPY.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/zQQDXyIt/
It has lost the 'look' of a triangle.
TJ
SPY has busted the low. Futures have not, yet.
Deletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/lT0hFLTm/
TJ
SPY wandering into (flattened) lower 3sd daily band now. Jan 20 low within range.
ReplyDeleteES/SPY (CFD) 30-min: after nine closes below the band there is finally a close above the band, resetting the number of consecutive closes.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tradingview.com/x/tGFxMLX5/
The slow stochastic is currently still embedded, and price is below the 18-period intraday. Further, there is now an 18 x 200 bear cross.
TJ
Reminder: AMD, AMGN, SMCI earnings after the close, among many others. TJ.
ReplyDeleteJust fyi - (from CNN) House passes government funding package to reopen government. TJ.
ReplyDeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ