tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post3601713830690285439..comments2024-03-29T02:43:21.464-04:00Comments on Elliott_Trader: Droning On - 2Elliott_Traderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-91224035253347272422019-09-18T16:31:35.460-04:002019-09-18T16:31:35.460-04:00YM/ES, off the LOD don't think it can be count...YM/ES, off the LOD don't think it can be counted as 1,2,3 as the start of an impulse. Do think it can be counted as a-b-c or 1,2,3,4,5 complete where 5 is the extended wave. Therefore minimum pullback should be the correction of the 1,2,3,4,5 or worse. Billyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04789527978026192974noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-40844554624950244002019-09-18T14:50:37.537-04:002019-09-18T14:50:37.537-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04698279995158493856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-52554599623161696692019-09-18T14:31:45.732-04:002019-09-18T14:31:45.732-04:00Here's the price since the announcement ...
h...Here's the price since the announcement ...<br /><br />https://invst.ly/cbsqg<br /><br />TJElliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-58020137921248306442019-09-18T12:26:57.946-04:002019-09-18T12:26:57.946-04:00..downward could 'also' be a simpler doubl.....downward could 'also' be a simpler double zigzag (or rarer triple zigzag) for a larger B wave. The point being, "it does not have to start with a diagonal".Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-9891377941852253592019-09-18T12:20:03.632-04:002019-09-18T12:20:03.632-04:00The triangle that 'failed' to materialize ...The triangle that 'failed' to materialize made just have been this less proportional one in the futures. Dow 'may' be making a diagonal downward (as per notes below). FED volatility pattern may be quite unpredictable and affect different indexes differently (different numbers of different types of stocks).<br /><br />https://invst.ly/cbqr9<br /><br />TJElliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-69754111440166903972019-09-18T12:09:33.708-04:002019-09-18T12:09:33.708-04:00Prior to FED: Yes, we know that a 'further'...Prior to FED: Yes, we know that a 'further' c wave is invalid upward, while the original 'c' wave, as shown, hit a 62% retracement on the downward wave. There are several versions of what can happen depending on the reaction to the FOMC. 1) larger triangles upward are possible, particularly if 2,993 is hit in the futures below, and then there is a strong rebound, 2) downward diagonals are next most likely to make a larger ((b)) wave.Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-82510326074301685972019-09-18T12:07:46.487-04:002019-09-18T12:07:46.487-04:00Yes, see below.Yes, see below.Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-2766976529451181862019-09-18T12:06:08.144-04:002019-09-18T12:06:08.144-04:00Yes, it might very well. Staying loose and flexibl...Yes, it might very well. Staying loose and flexible here.Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-51681117117796846252019-09-18T10:21:22.659-04:002019-09-18T10:21:22.659-04:00If Im reading correctly, looks like (e) was violat...If Im reading correctly, looks like (e) was violated.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-38860463155459828892019-09-18T08:50:27.747-04:002019-09-18T08:50:27.747-04:00We havent talked about the DJI 30min since the tri...We havent talked about the DJI 30min since the triangle from Friday failed to materialize. Looks like we moved below circle 2 as well. Any chance we could update<br />when handy?<br />Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-63268701891637292742019-09-18T07:51:46.232-04:002019-09-18T07:51:46.232-04:00Price consolidation at round number. Larger trend ...Price consolidation at round number. Larger trend remains up imho.<br />Tachyonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10866268625664509045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-33826536224994258172019-09-18T03:52:55.640-04:002019-09-18T03:52:55.640-04:00Right now (i) of potential A (if not top is in) is...Right now (i) of potential A (if not top is in) is deeper than recent (a) down, so maybe potential B of (Z) will morph into bigger triangle or something else that gives more price distance to B.Erik Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14192236925594985316noreply@blogger.com