tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post83986209646140403..comments2024-03-29T02:43:21.464-04:00Comments on Elliott_Trader: Profound Conflict and the Ways ForwardElliott_Traderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-18963900275006455482017-11-12T10:16:18.007-05:002017-11-12T10:16:18.007-05:00Thanks!Thanks!Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-15589028984891437802017-11-07T08:23:22.009-05:002017-11-07T08:23:22.009-05:00Excellent post. Well done. Excellent post. Well done. ScottZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15484725396872965335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-47626520107684045732017-11-06T20:12:00.843-05:002017-11-06T20:12:00.843-05:00Wow! You definitely work hard on your analysis. ...Wow! You definitely work hard on your analysis. Toddhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04106518316301480635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-45422103000092875112017-11-06T12:00:31.210-05:002017-11-06T12:00:31.210-05:00Bravo joe et félicitation pour ton travaIlle
Pa...Bravo joe et félicitation pour ton travaIlle <br />Parce que le marché est très compliqué à comprendre en ce moment domhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14296708463089757978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-71694290059521769772017-11-06T02:40:44.828-05:002017-11-06T02:40:44.828-05:00Another remarkable detail is the timeframe. Neely ...Another remarkable detail is the timeframe. Neely never analyzes times shorter than 240 minutes. Want this say that the rules are not met all in very small timeframes, like 5 minutes?6Qhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08501180361682845563noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-8949658613064265252017-11-05T19:46:08.167-05:002017-11-05T19:46:08.167-05:00Yes. I'm keenly aware, but it is only two week...Yes. I'm keenly aware, but it is only two weeks. Meanwhile the VIX is very, very near new all-time lows.Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-1541405082737965462017-11-05T17:35:26.240-05:002017-11-05T17:35:26.240-05:00"...like the $NYAD nearly at all time highs....."...like the $NYAD nearly at all time highs..."<br /><br />NYAD has been diverging negatively for the last two weeksrotrothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12478305615437936046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-61801261220685387222017-11-05T15:35:54.813-05:002017-11-05T15:35:54.813-05:00Yes, I am aware of Neely's current track recor...Yes, I am aware of Neely's current track record, although he typically ranks between 5th and 10th as a "Top Ten S&P Timer." I have no way to prove this, but my thought is largely due to the introduction of supposed "new" Elliott Wave patterns like Diametrics and Extracting Triangles. These patterns were not outlined in the original material, and Mastering Elliott Wave thus was predominately original EW with "more definitive rules", "more realistic pattern representations", and "fewer alternate patterns". This is what it set out to do. But now, instead of having alternate counts, he has "alternate pattens", and this is where I think he lost his way a bit. I don't know if he'll ever get it back.<br /><br />The problem is that I have found his rules regarding triangles, corrections and the ending and starting of waves so useful that it makes me think he was indeed really on the right track in many respects, but has actually not applied his very own original rules - just like Prechter was ignoring his channeling rule that led me to predict that he (Prechter) could be wrong about a Primary IVth wave. He was wrong, and he had followed his channel guideline he wouldn't be in the reputation mess he is in today. Now of course he shows that channel over & over again - when I showed it first in my YouTube channel in July, 2013.<br /><br />The thing is I "do" think there is something else wrong with NeoWave, and I am working very hard now to quantify it. I think it is something basic and relates to some simple founding definitions. When I have more of this work done and have something to share, I will.Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-24225363500048585642017-11-05T14:54:36.578-05:002017-11-05T14:54:36.578-05:00While Neely's 0-2 trendline rule has always ma...While Neely's 0-2 trendline rule has always made logical sense, I'm beginning to think that perhaps exceptions have to sometimes be made. His rules certainly haven't helped him in many years. I receive promo emails from him, and from the looks of things, his advisory business has collapsed. He's begging people to give him another chance. I don't know what his current count is, but from the content of his latest email, I don't think he knows what it is either. Relentless trending markets with essentially no measurable pullbacks, like SPX has been for 12 months, tend to steamroll all technical analysis.mblctahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07740912421131972048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-79923238002577572772017-11-05T14:43:28.404-05:002017-11-05T14:43:28.404-05:00Welcome. Glad you liked it.Welcome. Glad you liked it.Elliott_Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14941335198945083652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4251274909260261631.post-76896709483436121742017-11-05T14:11:08.853-05:002017-11-05T14:11:08.853-05:00Thank you Joe ! Very interesting analisys. It is n...Thank you Joe ! Very interesting analisys. It is not easy to remember and apply all the neowave rules. You never lose the details.6Qhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08501180361682845563noreply@blogger.com