...no, not a dime, but a few years? The depression question, of course, was "brother, can you spare a dime?" But this post refers to the fact that there is a "time" relationship in a potential ending diagonal and a 'prediction' that the chart below makes. The chart is of monthly log style in the S&P500 cash index using the Zigzag Indicator to get the price vertices correct. And it has a lot going for it including a rather nifty overall look.
![]() |
| S&P500 Cash Index - Monthly Log Scale - Degree Resolution |
The degree labels seem to resolve really well. Inside of Primary ⑤, Intermediate (1) is log shorter than Primary ③ the previous higher degree wave in the same direction. Primary ② and ④ look well-coupled and, for alternation, whereas Primary ② is a "running flat", Primary ④ is an "expanded flat" with a more extended Intermediate (B) wave and a lower Intermediate (C) wave.
From the indicator, the peak of the RSI is on Minor 3 of Intermediate (5) of Primary ③, and the first divergence is on Minor 5 of that same wave. The RSI is diverging since.
The Prediction
So, the prediction from the wave structure is that since the low of the diagonal was in 2020, then the entire diagonal should be retraced down to its Primary ④ beginnings in less time than the diagonal took to form. With the current year being 2026, that means it has about six years to accomplish this. Often, though, in an aggressive down move it can take 50-75% of that time, there being no published "rule" to this effect - just a tendency.
We know that traders tend to be an impatient lot as a group. They want to see fireworks to kick this thing off. That could happen. We have yet to see a 1-to-10 or 1-to-12 down day on the NYSE Advance/Decline line. But those have happened before, so we'll be on the lookout (BOLO) for one fairly soon to start a breadth thrust to the downside. We're not going to assume this will happen. It simply won't surprise us if it does - and we wouldn't call it a 'capitulation' as the financial media will likely try to say. Rather, it probably would be a "kick-off" to any downward wave sequences.
Epic Fail
Could we go higher from here? I suppose it is possible, but I can't yet find another good count to do that with. We have already tried one alternate ending diagonal, published it on this site as an alternate, and the market simply wouldn't have it. That failure seems to be one more signal that the market is more intent on correcting at the moment, than in going higher. So, we'll monitor closely for other alternates up to a point, but not for long. In the interim we'll listen to the market and see what it's telling us.
Meanwhile, have an excellent rest of the weekend. This is the second post since Thursday and if you have not read the first one, you might want to check that one out, too.
TraderJoe

Its difficult for me to comprehend the disparity in size of circle 1 and circle 5.
ReplyDeleteI know what you are saying. Here is something to consider. According to the Elliott Wave Principle by Frost & Prechter, "Usually only one of the waves of an impulse is the extended wave. But when there are two extended waves, they occur as waves three & five". So, I think what you are looking at is two waves that contain the extensions. TJ.
DeleteA thing of beauty! Can anyone thing of a more incredible confirmatory concatenation than a Cycle(or Super Cycle) degree top, and geo-political, and geo-economic events? I certainly cannot! May you live in interesting times...!
ReplyDeleteThanks Tj.
ReplyDeleteThe news of SpaceX not to be included in S&P yet is also one of reason as fund managers liquidating in asset classes on Friday to re-allocate in SpaceX so that they can squeeze retail later. Still a lot ocmoney required.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/06/05/spacex-blocked-from-early-us-benchmark-index-entry-as-sp-reaffirms-existing-rules.html
Origin of ED is Covid low. 4th wave of one lesser degree the GFC low. How long to both I wonder...?
ReplyDeletenooo..no..noo. If origin of ED is Covid low, that degree is Primary ④ or circle-4. So, that would make the fourth wave of one lower degree Intermediate (4), which is the 2016 low at about 1,810. The GFC low you cited is Cycle IV, which is one 'higher' degree. TJ.
DeleteJoe, interesting chart and potentially scary. If this is The Top, wouldn’t the MACD On Monthly chart more likely to diverge? Also recent AD LINE barely looks like it is diverging. Thanks
DeleteYIKES!!! That's RIGHT....OMG!!!
Delete@Rygbsurgn : as I have explained often in the blog, when using such a long time frame the PPO is the same as the MACD but for percentages. In other words, it takes into account inflation over the 5-to-10 year period. You can see it diverge in the chart link below.
DeletePPO Chart Link
TJ
Lower trend line of ED right around 6000. Could we take it out next week...??!!
ReplyDeleteLol
DeleteThanks TJ.
ReplyDeleteA new post is started for the next day.
ReplyDeleteTJ